22 Mar '15 18:57>
Originally posted by Very RustyDo you feel the injustice keenly?
I once got a forum ban for saying what I got in a P.M. in the General forum. My how times have changed!!!
-VR
Originally posted by divegeesterI feel that everyone should be treated equally. Not one set of rules for certain posters and a different set of rules for everyone else. Now, if that gets me a forum ban, so be it. It would also have proved my point.
Do you feel the injustice keenly?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThis forum is the Kim Kardashian school for airheads forum. Occasionally you get some of the ladies unafraid of going deep like drewnogal or hakima or Maura. Its fine if you want something trivial and light on a summers day, some of Suzzies fairy cakes or Randolphs nutty oatcakes but its no place for philosophers like you or me or badger, we are too complex, too deep, too much given to wine and poetry!
.... maybe because moonbus 'cares' about this online public forum.
Originally posted by Very RustyJust out of interest Very Busty, why do you sign your posts, we know who said it.
I feel that everyone should be treated equally. Not one set of rules for certain posters and a different set of rules for everyone else. Now, if that gets me a forum ban, so be it. It would also have proved my point.
You Sir, should not be above the rules. GB has been banned for less IMHO!
-VR
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt will give you something to think about when you're not crying in the forum, Snobbie carrobie. 😛
Just out of interest Very Busty, why do you sign your posts, we know who said it.
Originally posted by Very RustyI already see it as the desire to lay emphasis on your own importance, like people who underline their signatures. Whether consciously or otherwise this is what they are doing. They are saying I am an important person, which may or may not be the case. It could be that they generally feel important or that they infact have certain reservations and feel the need to reiterate to themselves that they are important because of some issue with self esteem they are having. I had initially thought that it was your way of marking your territory, like dogs which urinate in bushes but don't want to fall into a naturalism fallacy.
It will give you something to think about when you're not crying in the forum, Snobbie carrobie. 😛
P.S. Don't drive you self crazier than you already are trying to figure it out.
Have A Great Day!
-VR
Originally posted by robbie carrobie"... we are too complex, too deep, too much given to wine and poetry [or pastries]!" We're all given the privilege of speaking our minds, limited only by the liberal boundaries of RHP's Terms of Service. Imagine how things would be otherwise.
This forum is the Kim Kardashian school for airheads forum. Occasionally you get some of the ladies unafraid of going deep like drewnogal or hakima or Maura. Its fine if you want something trivial and light on a summers day, some of Suzzies fairy cakes or Randolphs nutty oatcakes but its no place for philosophers like you or me or badger, we are too complex, too deep, too much given to wine and poetry!
Originally posted by Very RustyPerhaps GB is not as well connected as I am.
I feel that everyone should be treated equally. Not one set of rules for certain posters and a different set of rules for everyone else. Now, if that gets me a forum ban, so be it. It would also have proved my point.
You Sir, should not be above the rules. GB has been banned for less IMHO!
-VR
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLeave Rusty alone Weasel Breath.
I already see it as the desire to lay emphasis on your own importance, like people who underline their signatures. Whether consciously or otherwise this is what they are doing. They are saying I am an important person, which may or may not be the case. It could be that they generally feel important or that they infact have certain reservations and ...[text shortened]... r territory, like dogs which urinate in bushes but don't want to fall into a naturalism fallacy.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyIs there anything in the ToS about revealling something in a PM?
"... we are too complex, too deep, too much given to wine and poetry [or pastries]!" We're all given the privilege of speaking our minds, limited only by the liberal boundaries of RHP's Terms of Service. Imagine how things would be otherwise.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSounds rather like a quote from Wind in the Willows.
...Randolphs nutty oatcakes but its no place for philosophers like you or me or badger, we are too complex, too deep, too much given to wine and poetry![/b]
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeA long ban I here.
Sounds rather like a quote from Wind in the Willows.
`Where's Mr. Badger?' inquired the Mole, as he warmed the coffee- pot before the fire.
`The master's gone into his study, sir,' replied the hedgehog, `and he said as how he was going to be particular busy this morning, and on no account was he to be disturbed.'
Originally posted by divegeester
Is there anything in the ToS about revealling something in a PM?
Forum Guidelines
You agree to not use the Service to:
Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;