Originally posted by robbie carrobiePoured scorn may have been a trifle hard, the sentiment is the same.
I have not poured scorn on the victim and I knew that you would attempt this. I have questioned her testimony based on known procedural facts and I have questioned why neither her nor her mother went to the police. It still remains unexplained why they think Jehovahs witnesses deal with criminality. If you cannot take criticism of your witnesses te ...[text shortened]... ticism into a weapon to vilify me personally then its more a reflection of you than it is of me.
I just your behaviour in threads like this one curious. Here we have case of a teenage girl who had been sexually abused and suffered numerous attempts at rape from her own father. Her testimony stood up and was good enough for the elders in her congregation as her father confessed, her testimony was also good enough in a court of law as her father was eventually sentenced to prison. Yet it's not good enough for you. In your two posts, one which was a substantial read, not once did you offer any support or express sympathy for the victim. Instead you appear, to me anyhow, to be mocking her with jokes about calling a plumber? If you genuinely want to garner an insight into the mind of what it's like to be, and the ramifications of being sexually abused I suggest you read her testimony. She is the victim after all.
Originally posted by GHOST HUNTERHang on, do you think 'pm' stands for 'Pickled Mullet'?!
i cheated a little i got 101 pms but to make it easy to work out, i never opened the last one
i won't reveal who, but one of the clones is turning.
I think if 101 people sent you Pickled Mullet sir they are probably trying to tell you something.
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukethat wins the worst post in the thread...weasels tapeworm and pickled mullet, oh my poor ribs hurt laughing so much..
Hang on, do you think 'pm' stands for 'Pickled Mullet'?!
I think if 101 people sent you Pickled Mullet sir they are probably trying to tell you something.
2 edits
Originally posted by Proper KnobThese were not jokes, it was an illustration. You have failed to explain why she approached the Watchtower and Bible tract society over a criminal matter, they do not deal with criminality, they are not trained to deal with criminality, they are not the police and have no jurisdiction over criminal matters that is why the illustration was employed not because it was a joke as you have once again wrongly assumed. You have also failed to explain why her mother did not go to the police either. I resent your attempt to use my questioning of her testimony and her inexplicable lack of knowledge to vilify me personally and to build essentially a straw man argument based on values that you have assumed.
Poured scorn may have been a trifle hard, the sentiment is the same.
I just your behaviour in threads like this one curious. Here we have case of a teenage girl who had been sexually abused and suffered numerous attempts at rape from her own father. Her testimony stood up and was good enough for the elders in her congregation as her father confessed ...[text shortened]... ications of being sexually abused I suggest you read her testimony. She is the victim after all.
I suggest you stop vilifying those people whose logic you cannot assail with reason.
adiós.
