Originally posted by robbie carrobieOn the contrary, I thought - and still think without any doubt whatsoever - that mere provision of the link to the thread in question was enough to support my characterization of your stance, and I maintain that all the evidence I required comes from your own mouth during the exchanges on that thread.
I suspect that he initially thought that the mere mention of the issue would be enough to stigmatize his opponent and attempted to use it to create some threats.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFYes its a pity that you have failed to provide a shred of evidence though and could not bring yourself to address the very evidence that you cited yourself which soundly refuted your allegations. I suspect that no amount of empirical evidence would convince the truly deluded, its like arguing against stupidity, it simply cannot be done.
On the contrary, I thought - and still think without any doubt whatsoever - that mere provision of the link to the thread in question was enough to support my characterization of your stance, and I maintain that all the evidence I required comes from your own mouth during the exchanges on that thread.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAll these repeated catchphrases and insult words! I can't remember you ever seeming so rattled for so many pages in a row. 😛
Dude i m gonna be honest I am finding it tiresome to read the same drivel page after page, it was ok at the time, now its just a drag. I cannot promise that I will read your texts, I have refuted your allegation with empirical evidence, its enough for me. You carry on believing your own propaganda if you like, who knows maybe you may convince someone other than yourself.
Originally posted by FMFdude honestly you have no idea, time seems to be running backwards with every post that I read, believe what you want man, I need to chill.
All these repeated catchphrases and insult words! I can't remember you ever seeming so rattled for so many pages in a row. 😛
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's no mystery why you tacked those self-contradicting sentences onto the end of the thread. Why haven't you made any reference at all to the arguments defending institutional cover up of child sex abuse that you laid out on the previous nine pages? Why haven't you quoted anything that you said or any of the justifications you offered during the discussion with several posters? That you tried to bail out at the end is no surprise, but what was the argument you were presenting on those nine pages leading up to you bailing out and why was it necessary to suddenly contradict yourself and bail out at all?
Yes its a pity that you have filed to provide a shred of evidence though and could not bring yourself to address the very evidence that you cited yourself which refuted your allegations. I suspect that no amount of empirical evidence would convince the truly deluded.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by FMFMost of all, the biggest question in the mind of anyone observing page after page of this thread...and so many others...is why you seem to take delight in hounding individuals time and again, along with your sidekick divegeester? Why do you do it? Do you see yourself as some kind of cross-examining super-hero, with a mission to expose someone or other for something or other, the accusation largely of your own making?
It's no mystery why you tacked those self-contradicting sentences onto the end of the thread. Why haven't you made any reference at all to the arguments defending institutional cover up of child sex abuse that you laid out on the previous nine pages? Why haven't you quoted anything that you said or any of the justifications you offered during the discussion with ...[text shortened]... to you bailing out and why was it necessary to suddenly contradict yourself and bail out at all?
2 edits
Originally posted by StartreaderThis is a very interesting question. It appears to me to be a form of sadism as if the only happiness FMF knows is in attempting to inflict some kind of pain on other people. He tries to justify it on the basis that people should be held accountable for their own words but as you have correctly ascertained, by and large the sordid process usually has as its basis nothing more than a fabricated allegation. Over the years i have proffered various hypothesis but nothing is concrete yet.
Most of all, the biggest question in the mind of anyone observing page after page of this thread...and so many others...is why you seem to take delight in hounding individuals time and again, along with your sidekick divegeester? Why do you do it? Do you see yourself as some kind of cross-examining super-hero, with a mission to expose someone or other for something or other, the accusation largely of your own making?
1 edit
Originally posted by StartreaderWhat do you make of robbie's defence of covering up sex abuse as he explained on Thread 162947? He seems to be have been cornered into retracting it - thank goodness, it was odious to say the least - although he is still refusing to even acknowledge what he said, so his retraction might be worthless, as they often are. The only person I see taking "delight" in all this is the "delight" robbie seems to take in issuing the same cliched teenage insults and catchphrases over and over again instead of discussing the serious topic properly and instead of taking responsibility for disgraceful indefensible things he has said here in public in the recent past.
Most of all, the biggest question in the mind of anyone observing page after page of this thread...and so many others...is why you seem to take delight in hounding individuals time and again, along with your sidekick divegeester? Why do you do it? Do you see yourself as some kind of cross-examining super-hero, with a mission to expose someone or other for something or other, the accusation largely of your own making?
Originally posted by FMFI have not retracted nor will i retract anything in the thread, my handling of the sensitive issue was masterly, my reasoning a delight to the senses and the spanking that you took must have left a deep hole in your psyche. Nothing I have said is in the least bit odious or disgraceful despite your vile insinuations to the contrary.
What do you make of robbie's defence of covering up sex abuse as he explained on Thread 162947? He seems to be have been cornered into retracting it - thank goodness, it was odious to say the least - although he is still refusing to even acknowledge what he said, so his retraction might be worthless, as they often are. The only person I see taking ...[text shortened]... esponsibility for disgraceful indefensible things he has said here in public in the recent past.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by FMFInteresting. Over and over again you exhibit an almost relentless delight in trying to corner an individual,...any individual and any topic seems to do...and yet you're apparently unaware of doing so.
What do you make of robbie's defence of covering up sex abuse as he explained on Thread 162947? He seems to be have been cornered into retracting it - thank goodness, it was odious to say the least - although he is still refusing to even acknowledge what he said, so his retraction might be worthless, as they often are. The only person I see taking ...[text shortened]... esponsibility for disgraceful indefensible things he has said here in public in the recent past.
To what do you attribute this trait of yours?
Originally posted by StartreaderA couple of topics that I take pretty seriously are people denying that there is such a things as marital rape and people defending the covering up of the sexual abuse of children. If you feel cornered by the fact I am willing to confront people in cyberspace who propagate such things, then it is because of things you've said about these topics in the past.
Interesting. Over and over again you exhibit an almost relentless delight in trying to corner an individual,...any individual and any topic seems to do...and yet you're apparently unaware of doing so.
To what do you attribute this trait of yours?
Originally posted by FMFJustification for your sadistic bullying and stalking people, I don't think so.
A couple of topics that I take pretty seriously are people denying that there is such a things as marital rape and people defending the covering up of the sexual abuse of children. If you feel cornered by the fact I am willing to confront people in cyberspace who propagate such things, then it is because of things you've said about these topics in the past.
Infact Startreader has you down to a T. You will attempt to corner and bully and humiliate anyone on any issue almost. If you cannot find anything you will fabricate it. This has nothing to do with serious issues as you have claimed and which is demonstrably false but it has everything however to do with a sinister and creepy personality. If you are willing to lie and fabricate values about other people in order to simply attack them you have a problem, a serious problem.