Originally posted by eldragonflyI got alot of crap in another thread for referring to my grand mother as a "hatchet packer" which she of course called herself. I am about 1/4 Native American and that people used to kill the buffalo and use every part of it. Then some other people came along and killed it only for it's hide.
dave you are a complete idiot, of course you must "demonstrate" this by using bullying tactics and cheap moronic insults that anyone who believes that nature should be respected and the environment should not carelessly destroyed, by labeling anyone who disagrees with your pheny and anthropocentric views as a tree hugger. It is wrong to murder animals only to eat them, too bad you don't understand this more clearly.
Now THAT was murder.
Myself going to the store to get some steaks is not murder.
And i think calling someone an idiot is a little harsher than being called tree hugger.
Dave
Originally posted by Ice ColdRemember that Smother's Brothers skit " Mom always liked you best"
From this I must presume, someone murdered some farm animal you really loved allot.
My deepest sympathies. 🙁
I am seeing that chicken right now..."Frank was a good hiker" and "it was hard for the chicken to pull that one wheeled wagon!"
That entire analogy was enough to make me have to get up and get another beer...it was enough to make my brain hurt.
Dave
Originally posted by nmdavidbHonest man, I was just helping the lamb over the fence. 😳
I wonder how he feels about sheep famers who engage in...uhhh..."practices" with the sheep?
He ain't eating em...the sheep most likely don't complain...and he gives em a haircut on a regular basis!!
Dave
Originally posted by nmdavidbYou're entitled to your own views/diet/lifestyle choices, but your referral to a carnivorous diet as "natural selection" is absurd, retarded and disrespectful to the animals you eat.
This is why I do not like tree huggers.
Dude...no one is putting down your right to not eat meat...but do not push your views on me.
Originally posted by eldragonflyIn recognition of the truth I would say Spot was neither murdered nor dispatched. In the scenario you created in your mind game Spot was 'killed'. Spot was not murdered. I will repeat. You cannot murder an animal that is not a human being. I think you ought to take time to refer to your dictionary if you have one.
Wrong! You must be exceedingly dense, every avoiding any real discussion, always going for the cheap shots, always playing the definition game, always leading nowhere, never recognizing the truth..Let's play a "mind game" here...
Now would you say that spot was murdered or just dispatched? You would have to be a very insensitive, foolish and shallow p ...[text shortened]... murdered, a needless act, an unnecessary tragedy.
Of course the person was never caught.
I have better things to do than to imagine my daughter's dog being killed. However, if it were I'm sure I'd get some pretty spicy burgers out of it! 😏😏
Originally posted by nmdavidbIrrelevant. You are afraid to look at the issue beyond your own selfishness and insensitivity, or else you are unable to fathom the true nature of cruelty underneath, incapable of understanding the concepts at play here.
This is why I do not like tree huggers.
You are living in a dreamworld. Your speciesist language and your bankrupt and witless assertions only point to a narrowminded agenda, to one whom is unable to fathom the world around him.
Stay in your tunnelvision world.