Originally posted by no1marauderLet's see...I'm an idiot, a liar, a dimwit, a twit.
Wrong about what, you twit? What exact aid could realms halfway across the board give each other? 🙄
You're a childish nutcase. And you stink at these games; go back to something easier like marbles.
And I'm a childish nutcase? You're not doing very well to make your case a convincing one. Maybe you could go to school to learn how to do that. 😉
Originally posted by no1marauderSpeaking of answering questions that you've avoided, where is your proof that I have "spread falsehoods?"
They make their own decisions, unlike you. And I see you have no answer to the question except your usual childish stammering. Pathetic.
As I told you before, and I reiterate now, put up or STFU.
1 edit
Originally posted by eagles54It is disturbing to see Otomo turn into Mini-Me. Maybe he hasn't realised it yet.
As an aside, you really need to work on your goad. Not only is it transparent and easily brushed away, but others try to emulate your style. It fails miserably for them as well, Ryuzoji.
Yes, Otomo, you should have been more diplomatically active. Your ignoring my messages led me to believe that you were in cahoots with the uncouth Ryuzoji and therefore a legitimate enemy, which is why I encouraged Hosokawa to attack you, which is how the whole thing started, I believe.
Originally posted by no1marauderScary Ryuzoji.
Amako was at war with Mori and Hokosawa was at war with Otomo. And you're still not on Kyushu what 6 turns after entering that war? Ito would have had to face me alone and I was Royalty with at least equal Gold Province value. There wouldn't have been much left if and when you got there. But that would have suited you fine; Ito virtually destroyed and Kyushu divided.
Shikoku is separated from Kyushu in case you hadn't noticed. If Ito had gone along with me, I'd have taken over one of his cities or towns in much the same way I took over Sanuki, along with a Han, and started building. Hosokawa could have coped with Otomo on his own (it was when Ito started getting involved that I decided to act). So it would have been you against Ito and Uesugi. Well, so much for might-have-beens!
You continue to underestimate the value of diplomacy. If you talk nicely and sensibly to people you can get them to listen to you, even if they are all the way across the board, and especially since this is an all-RHP game.
2 edits
Originally posted by Bosse de NageYour BS is tiresome. Hokosawa only agreed to give you his capital and major building center when he was on the very verge of defeat, but Ito would have just given you a major build center (he only has 2 and one wasn't taken until turn 6) right off the bat? And you never had a unit anywhere near a position to take over such a province. By turn 9, Ito was my vassal, so your "what might have been" is the sheerest of fantasy.
Scary Ryuzoji.
Shikoku is separated from Kyushu in case you hadn't noticed. If Ito had gone along with me, I'd have taken over one of his cities or towns in much the same way I took over Sanuki, along with a Han, and started building. Hosokawa could have coped with Otomo on his own (it was when Ito started getting involved that I decided to act). S ...[text shortened]... , even if they are all the way across the board, and especially since this is an all-RHP game.
Your starting to sound like suzianne in MD; of course, I engage in diplomacy all the time. What is ridiculous is the new found claim by you and the Monk that somehow, someway any diplomacy I might have done would have avoided the result that Honshu would be united under two allied groups by turn 10. That is your and the Monk's accomplishment (aided by the lack of ambition of your allies) and no matter how nice I talked to anybody, I had no leverage to prevent it.
EDIT: On turn 8, Hosokawa ceded you Sanuki; there are no Ito forces on or/near Shikoku. More falsehoods.
Originally posted by eagles54Are you going to send me whiny PM's like you did in MD until I had to put you on my "banned" or whatever list? You're a pathetic failure in the games AND as a human being.
As an aside, you really need to work on your goad. Not only is it transparent and easily brushed away, but others try to emulate your style. It fails miserably for them as well, Ryuzoji.
5 edits
Originally posted by no1marauderWho said anything about right off the bat--everybody understands the importance of timing///Sure you engage in diplomacy, just not with the right people///Because I asked Ito to get them off (they were there before that: look at turn 5 and 6).
Your BS is tiresome. Hokosawa only agreed to give you his capital and major building center when he was on the very verge of defeat, but Ito would have just given you a major build center (he only has 2 and one wasn't taken until turn 6) right off the bat? /// Your starting to sound like suzianne in MD; of course, I engage in diplomacy all the tim ...[text shortened]... turn 8, Hosokawa ceded you Sanuki; there are no Ito forces on or/near Shikoku. More falsehoods.
Ito had three build centres at that stage: Hyuga, Kushima and Sendai. Any one of them would have done nicely.
Anything else you want to rave about?
1 edit
Originally posted by Bosse de NageWhat a clown you are; Ito was still at war with the Shimazu on turn 6, but he was supposed to go to war with the Ryuzoji, too? Again you have no units anywhere near Ito's territory. You would have needed a major build center to make a difference, not merely a village with a small capability. And your building capability was quite limited at that time AND you were engaged in other wars on Honshu.
Who said anything about right off the bat--everybody understands the importance of timing///Sure you engage in diplomacy, just not with the right people///Because I asked Ito to get them off (they were there before that: look at turn 5 and 6).
Ito had three build centres at that stage: Hyuga, Kushima and Sendai. Any one of them would have done nicely.
Anything else you want to rave about?
In short, you're full of it; if Ito had declared war against the Ryuzoji in turns 6-8 he would have faced a superior foe alone and you wouldn't have been able to send any support at all. You might check the seas around Kyushu; they were dominated by my ally and vassal the Otomo. So all the Ito would have done is serve your interest, not their own.
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderGee, Ito was at war with Shimazu, who was disappearing at lightning speed around the bend. How challenging to be at war with more than one enemy. It would have been a question of timing, as I said.
In short, you're full of it; if Ito had declared war against the Ryuzoji in turns 6-8 he would have faced a superior foe alone and you wouldn't have been able to send any support at all. You might check the seas around Kyushu; they were dominated by my ally and vassal the Otomo. So all the Ito would have done is serve your interest, not their own.
The seas around Shikoku were also dominated by Otomo when I arrived in Sanuki. It came as a bit of a surprise, as I recall.
Have a nice day now.