Go back
Shooting tragedy

Shooting tragedy

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by apathist
I hold the unpopular opinion that the raising of kids is too important to leave up to the random parents. It should take the village.
I totally agree with you. Families should look after eachother too, keep those bonds. Social inclusion is so valuable. I don't think it's an unpopular opnion, but I do think people don't recognise it's importance or for some govenments- people just don't know how to 'make it so' (as Captian Pickard would say!).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SmookieP
What's the argument? Guns don't kill people, people do?

Well you know what, monkeys can shoot guns too! Should we get rid of the Monkeys? Or the guns?

Just a thought.
LOL!!
Hey Smooks 🙂

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by yo its me
LOL!!
Hey Smooks 🙂
lol your avatar scared the hell out of me I thought i was hallucinating for a second. Did you make that your-self

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

some countries have ban automatic weapons for this reason


Originally posted by Busygirl

I'm surprised no one has yet mentioned the impact of violent video games. I don't think there are any protections in the constitution that justify their continued production and distribution.
Parental leadership in the home.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
the video game thing is just dumb.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Parental leadership in the home.
the kid also killed his mom


Originally posted by tim88
the kid also killed his mom
I know. It'll take awhile for the whole story to come out.


Originally posted by tim88
lol your avatar scared the hell out of me I thought i was hallucinating for a second. Did you make that your-self
It's really good isn't it. I didn't make it, I'm not that bright!


-Removed-
That is not a stupid idea, but how do you answer this:

outlaw guns and only outlaws have guns

don't you want to be able to protect your turf, your home and family


Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by apathist
Originally posted by Kegge
Yeah ... the six year olds should have been packed with a .45

Hard to believe you are willfully that stupid. There are lots of responsible adults at any school, and this story has more than a handful dead now, and all unarmed.

[quote]... take away the guns and there will be far less shootings. THAT is ...[text shortened]... s.

Outlaw guns, and only outlaws will have guns. If even one teacher at that school carried.
Just check the facts and see who the stupid one is. Where are more spree killings? The countries which outlawed guns or the countries that haven't.

It is not about completely eradicating violence, because that seems impossible, but it's a lot more difficult to kill with your bare hands than with a gun.

Those responsible adults are not the ones killing. It is the ones that are sick and get their hands on the guns of those "responsible". If the reports are correct this killer took his mother's guns ... one of the teachers of the school.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sumydid
Explain why the cities in this country with laws REQUIRING gun ownership... have the lowest crime rates of all.

If someone wants a gun, they're going to get a gun. Only people who live in fantasy land would argue that if there is a prohibition on guns, no one will be able to get one. Clearly, someone as evil as this 20 year old, is not going to be deter ...[text shortened]... it's the only solution other than everyone home schooling (which I am even more in favor of).
What does this mean. That there are cities just are required to have a gun, or a license to own a gun? No guns means no gun killings ... it is that simple really.