Go back
Take it elsewhere.

Take it elsewhere.

General

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
What are you trying to prove?

P-
What part of the post you are replying to don't you understand?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
What part of the post you are replying to don't you understand?
You assume too much, as you've just done again.

P-

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Does your phaser even have a stun setting?

P-
It's not my phaser setting that's the issue here. It's Russ's.

"Hard line" means "banned". Ravello clearly tested that line after Russ's warning and he should go. Otherwise "hard line' means "Oh well, we'll give him/her another chance.
If that doesn't happen then its biased, because I have no absolutely doubts about what would have happened to me if I transgressed that way.

skeeter

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
I propose a ban on cheap sociology.
i'll second that - the way some people here carry on, you'd think they were designing the constitution for a new nation, rather than posting crap in an excellent chess site...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by arrakis
I totally disagree. That procedure is why many people stopped posting at RHP. I'm looking forward to being able to post w/o the sickies attacking me personally.
Then do not post things that may upset the usual suspects

šŸ˜‰

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
Aren't you even aware you are on the list.
What has that got to do with it? My opinion on the matter doesn't change just because I may or may not be on some list.

I also think it's bizarre that people assume that past transgressions are forgiven, just because we've been warned about a particular type of act. Even those of you who say things are at zero-play are unlikely to treat those posters with whom you've had previous beef with, in any other way than you have been thus far.

Red Night will still post irritating commentary on other people's posts without adding anything to the discussion. skeeter will continue to act like she's best remembered. And you and I will continue to annoy each other and the rest of the community, of that I have no doubt.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
What has that got to do with it? My opinion on the matter doesn't change just because I may or may not be on some list.

I also think it's bizarre that people assume that past transgressions are forgiven, just because we've been warned about a particular type of act. Even those of you who say things are at zero-play are unlikely to treat those posters w ...[text shortened]... will continue to annoy each other and the rest of the community, of that I have no doubt.
I'll take that as a complement. Thanks. By the way, even though you are right about being anoying, I truly wish you sucsess as a soon to be father. You really should be more careful and less anoying now. You need to learn to set a better example. So the child won't grow up with some kind of a complex or black eye.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by skeeter
All in the past now Rav. Time to play some chess.

skeeter
That doesn't make it any less wrong

Only an eternal ban would be righteous and restore the equilibrium of justice at RHP


TsP

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by The Slow Pawn
That doesn't make it any less wrong

[b]Only an eternal ban would be righteous and restore the equilibrium of justice at RHP



TsP[/b]
You could always ban yourself if it would help you deal with your issues.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
You could always ban yourself if it would help you deal with your issues.
You could always not get involved in something that doesn't affect you in the first place.

tool

TsP


Originally posted by cashthetrash
I'll take that as a complement. Thanks. By the way, even though you are right about being anoying, I truly wish you sucsess as a soon to be father. You really should be more careful and less anoying now. You need to learn to set a better example. So the child won't grow up with some kind of a complex or black eye.
The only contact you've ever had with Starrman is through this forum when he's responding to morons like you. It's incredibly arrogant for you judge him and to try and lecture him on his potential parenting skills based on that alone.


Originally posted by The Slow Pawn
You could always not get involved in something that doesn't affect you in the first place.

tool

TsP
You should listen to your own advise.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
The only contact you've ever had with Starrman is through this forum when he's responding to morons like you. It's incredibly arrogant for you judge him and to try and lecture him on his potential parenting skills based on that alone.
There is plenty of arrogance to go around. We will leave all the lectures and insults to you then? NOT!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
There is plenty of arrogance to go around. We will leave all the lectures and insults to you then? NOT!
Good idea, we'll let you carry on with it. It's far more entertaining to read the unfounded, malicious tripe you always spout out.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Hey guys, you're all doing pretty well, soon you'll be ready for the next step, like these folks:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/31/business/chinet.php