Originally posted by skeeterNice to see you moving your energies onto something more constructive.
Tsk. Tsk. Rav. Thats private info and a banning offence. I've alerted it.
skeeter
In any case, your energies are wasted. Phlab posted his name in these forums a number of times. Obviously, his beliefs about online anonymity seems to have changed due to an unnamed person's attack on his business website. Ravello used his name in a friendly manner, not in the "confrontational" manner that you frequently did, and like Cash did when flaming Starrman about his upcoming child.
Anyway, I'm sick of feeding the trolls.
Have a nice life.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakFirst rec for you
Nice to see you moving your energies onto something more constructive.
In any case, your energies are wasted. Phlab posted his name in these forums a number of times. Obviously, his beliefs about online anonymity seems to have changed due to an unnamed person's attack on his business website. Ravello used his name in a friendly manner, not in the "con ...[text shortened]... out his upcoming child.
Anyway, I'm sick of feeding the trolls.
Have a nice life.
D
TsP
Originally posted by StarrmanBlah Blah Blah Blah Blah
What has that got to do with it? My opinion on the matter doesn't change just because I may or may not be on some list.
I also think it's bizarre that people assume that past transgressions are forgiven, just because we've been warned about a particular type of act. Even those of you who say things are at zero-play are unlikely to treat those posters w ...[text shortened]... will continue to annoy each other and the rest of the community, of that I have no doubt.
Originally posted by The Slow PawnIf someone began to hand out bans based on the criterion you suggest, you might find that some of your friends are gone as well. Possibly, even you yourself.
That doesn't make it any less wrong
[b]Only an eternal ban would be righteous and restore the equilibrium of justice at RHP
TsP[/b]