Originally posted by huckleberryhoundI'm always hungry! But that'll be our secret. And you're always welcome at my table, Huck, with (nearly) whatever guests you choose to bring along. (Bringing food wouldn't hurt, either!)
Well if you've got a pique-nique soon, you wont be hungry i suppose. . . am i invited ?
Originally posted by skeeterOnce again your logic is as flawed as it can get (sometimes I wonder how you manage to play chess on such a high level, you know) ...
Clean slate for everyone Boris. Bit like the recs - we all start even.
skeeter
What have recs. got to do that you clearly violated 3c on more then just one occasion?
If anyone still remebers the threads in question, please post the links here - many thanks -
As for you Skeeter, RHP would be a better place without you, no doubt about that, hell any place would be a better place without you (wanna lend my gun?)
TsP
Originally posted by The Slow PawnThats all history now Boris. It's what we all say and do from this point on that will incur penalties. Russ was quite specific about that.
Once again your logic is as flawed as it can get (sometimes I wonder how you manage to play chess on such a high level, you know) ...
What have recs. got to do that you clearly violated 3c on more then just one occasion?
If anyone still remebers the threads in question, please post the links here - many thanks -
As for you Skeeter, RHP would ...[text shortened]... oubt about that, hell any place would be a better place without you (wanna lend my gun?)
TsP
skeeter
Originally posted by skeeterI don't care about your stance towards this - If you had gone out and shot someone, do you really think it would have been forgotten at any point?
Thats all history now Boris. It's what we all say and do from this point on that will incur penalties. Russ was quite specific about that.
skeeter
Fact remains that you should (must) be banned from RHP for the multiple violations on your behalf.
The pleasure, if this actually goes through, I would consider as a bonus.
TsP
1 edit
Originally posted by The Slow PawnPosting links to bannable threads would presumably render one cannon-fodder for the banner-man.
If anyone still remebers the threads in question, please post the links here - many thanks -
As for you Skeeter, RHP would be a better place without you, no doubt about that, hell any place would be a better place without you (wanna [b]lend my gun?)
TsP[/b]
nb.borrow
Originally posted by The Slow PawnAre you thick or what? I'm not being punished for any past transgressions but if there's any incidence of past behaviour then Russ will act, and that goes for all parties, yourself included. So stop being a prat and move on. The rest of us are.
I don't care about your stance towards this - If you had gone out and shot someone, do you really think it would have been forgotten at any point?
Fact remains that you should (must) be banned from RHP for the multiple violations on your behalf.
The pleasure, if this actually goes through, I would consider as a bonus.
TsP
skeeter
Originally posted by skeeterI don't care what the rest of your type does ... I'm sure as heaven will stand here righterous and request you being banned as of having been in clear violation of 3c (and reading most of your posts, still are)
Are you thick or what? I'm not being punished for any past transgressions but if there's any incidence of past behaviour then Russ will act, and that goes for all parties, yourself included. So stop being a prat and move on. The rest of us are.
skeeter
TsP
Originally posted by The Slow PawnBoris, as much as you dislike her and want her banned, the reality is that she hasn't shot anybody and Russ has a right to conduct matters as he sees fit as it is his site. He has set a boundary. Let's all move on.
I don't care about your stance towards this - If you had gone out and shot someone, do you really think it would have been forgotten at any point?
Fact remains that you should (must) be banned from RHP for the multiple violations on your behalf.
The pleasure, if this actually goes through, I would consider as a bonus.
TsP
Originally posted by kirksey957I wouldn't put money on that, LOL
she hasn't shot anybody
Anyway, some things are forgiven (not forgotten), others are not. This is one I won't forgive (nor forget) as her attacks where spitefull and well thought out. Skeeter is not a child, consequently responsible for her actions and by posting stirctly private information without XNZ's consent she clearly had one aim and that is to inflict as much damage as potentially possible.
It is not calling someone a 4-letter etc. it is an attack against the real-life person behind the RHP character and for that there is only one possibly acceptable solution - a permanent ban -
And it doesn't matter when it happens as Skeeter is as evil as she has always been
TsP
PS: and no, I am not a great fan of XNZ and this is not coming from the PFC, this is my point of view well backed up with strong arguments
Originally posted by The Slow PawnIs anyone a "great fan" of XNZ?
I wouldn't put money on that, LOL
Anyway, some things are forgiven (not forgotten), others are not. This is one I won't forgive (nor forget) as her attacks where spitefull and well thought out. Skeeter is not a child, consequently responsible for her actions and by posting stirctly private information without XNZ's consent she clearly had one aim ...[text shortened]... is is not coming from the PFC, this is my point of view well backed up with strong arguments