The issue of posting personal information about people has arisen before, and it is forbidden on RHP. Now, we appreciate that some content is available on the Internet, and therefore could be considered in the public domain, but we do not want to see it duplicated here, particularly when it is used in a confrontational manner.
We are now going to take a hardline on this, as some people appear adamant on wasting our time. If you want to squabble and flame each other, as I said, please take it elsewhere.
Thanks,
-Russ
Originally posted by RussMaybe you should advise just how hard a line will be taken, to prevent people [i[testing[/i] just far they can go.
The issue of posting personal information about people has arisen before, and it is forbidden on RHP. Now, we appreciate that some content is available on the Internet, and therefore could be considered in the public domain, but we do not want to see it duplicated here, particularly when it is used in a confrontational manner.
We are now going to take a har ...[text shortened]... want to squabble and flame each other, as I said, please take it elsewhere.
Thanks,
-Russ
Edit Same as Palynka but I typed more words lol
Originally posted by RussI don't suppose you could ban people taking credit for your changing the rec system while you're at it ???
The repeat offenders know who they are. And a recent case of feedback complaining about such behaviour when they themselves were guilty has forced this upon me. It has to stop.
-Russ
edit: it is all very tiresome.
It's starting to be a pain in the hole
edit. please don't ban me.
Originally posted by tmetzlerAs long as there remains no concrete boundary to what is and is not acceptible, the testing of how far you can go is a mandatory part of existing in the social arena we have here. Eitehr the law is laid down secret police style, or it is left to society to police itself, in which case the boundaries are relative and can only be ascertained by pushing against them.
If there is a question about it, how about just not posting it?
Anybody posting info to [b]test how far they can go, should get banned just for testing. No warnings.[/b]
Originally posted by StarrmanI propose a ban on cheap sociology.
As long as there remains no concrete boundary to what is and is not acceptible, the testing of how far you can go is a mandatory part of existing in the social arena we have here. Eitehr the law is laid down secret police style, or it is left to society to police itself, in which case the boundaries are relative and can only be ascertained by pushing against them.
Originally posted by RussThree cheers for Russ.
The issue of posting personal information about people has arisen before, and it is forbidden on RHP. Now, we appreciate that some content is available on the Internet, and therefore could be considered in the public domain, but we do not want to see it duplicated here, particularly when it is used in a confrontational manner.
We are now going to take a har ...[text shortened]... want to squabble and flame each other, as I said, please take it elsewhere.
Thanks,
-Russ
perhaps the solution may be individually; particularly to let
two who hate each other bash themselves freely until both get
banned... of course, the tribes and e-buddies should stay away...
Sort of a forum to replace Meet Opponents simulating a
ring, where two suscribe in a celebrity deathmatch and
slap each other until death = ban.