11 Oct '13 18:57>
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout15You must be another spurned lover of mine.
Yep....with the word boner in his name it would be darvlay alright.
Originally posted by SahuaroCurious, the post of mine that Bob called 'hearsay' got 2 thumbs down while this post of yours supporting my post gets 2 thumbs up. Go figure.
It's not hearsay; it's factual. You should know by now that Suzianne doesn't make up or repeat bs. If you look down from Bowmann's pedestal, you'll see a field of the wounded and scarred.
Originally posted by SahuaroOriginally posted by Suzianne
It's not hearsay; it's factual. You should know by now that Suzianne doesn't make up or repeat bs. If you look down from Bowmann's pedestal, you'll see a field of the wounded and scarred.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThat's not what this is about. We're talking about a person who systematically abused as many people as he could lay hooks into.
Originally posted by Suzianne
Let's just say that while a large percentage of males here feel that he was an "alright chap" based on his 'public persona', most females here who had any PMs or private conversations with him would agree that he was a creep, not above taking any advantage he could over women, including blackmail. Enough said.
[ ...[text shortened]...
Would you be one of the "females here who had any PMs or private conversations with him..."?
Originally posted by lolofYoung women with shady backgrounds were his main targets, they were most susceptible, I'm guessing. Young women are the most trusting, and this was what, 7 or 8 years ago.
I have no experience from that person. Couldn't he just have been ignored?
Originally posted by SuzianneBut did he get to know them on this site?
Young women with shady backgrounds were his main targets, they were most susceptible, I'm guessing. Young women are the most trusting, and this was what, 7 or 8 years ago.
I might have fallen into the same thing had I not already had my earlier problems with internet relationships and subsequent internet stalking. I was aware what could happen, and he ...[text shortened]... t to themselves forever, they eventually brag about it, and that's usually when they get busted.
Originally posted by SuzianneWhat was he actually able to do to these people? Would he get information from them and then threaten to do something with it? What I'm asking is, was it just a mind game he was playing or was he somehow able to impact their lives in a very real way?
Young women with shady backgrounds were his main targets, they were most susceptible, I'm guessing. Young women are the most trusting, and this was what, 7 or 8 years ago.
I might have fallen into the same thing had I not already had my earlier problems with internet relationships and subsequent internet stalking. I was aware what could happen, and he ...[text shortened]... t to themselves forever, they eventually brag about it, and that's usually when they get busted.
Originally posted by lemon limeNo, it went further than mind games. If it was only mind games, they could blow him off. Yes, as suggested by his profile, once he had video of his victim, he would threaten to use it as he saw fit. As I said, he preyed on the susceptibility of women, mainly those who he was able to figure out had just left other relationships. Women in this state are vulnerable (more so when younger, I guess wisdom comes only with age, or prior experience) because they feel undeserving of being wanted and they can fall for the suggestions of unscrupulous people. Been there, done that, although not on this site.
What was he actually able to do to these people? Would he get information from them and then threaten to do something with it? What I'm asking is, was it just a mind game he was playing or was he somehow able to impact their lives in a very real way?