1 edit
@very-rusty saidYes, of course, I remember saying it. And it's not "personal abuse", you silly billy.
let me remind you of your own post to Suzie Q in this very thread.
I've been subjected to way more personal abuse over the years on the Spirituality Forum than here. There is no significant "opposition" to my posting here on the General Forum. I don't see my posting on any forum as "getting away with" anything.
Do you remember saying the aforementioned?
@fmf saidWouldn't that be left up to the personal interpretation of the person it was directed to fmf? The person may consider it "personal abuse", where you or I may not. 🙂
Yes, of course saying it. And it's not "personal abuse".
-VR
@very-rusty saidIt was just three statements. It was not "personal abuse" in any shape or form, just as this reply to you is not "personal abuse".
Wouldn't that be left up to the personal interpretation of the person it was directed to fmf? The person may consider it "personal abuse", where you or I may not.
@earl-of-trumps saidI can be robust and candid, if that's what you are referring to. And my candour might not be to everyone's taste. But I cannot remember resorting to "personal abuse".
Oh, nooooooooooooooo, you'd never resort to personal attack 🤔 🤔 🤔 😆
@fmf saidOK I agree with you, so if one considered they had been "personally abused", wouldn't they alert the post, and let the Site Moderator decide on it? His/Her assessment hopefully would be unbiased right?
It was just three statements. It was not "personal abuse" in any shape or form, just as this reply to you is not "personal abuse".
-VR
@very-rusty saidI don't alert posts. I think everyone's true colours should be left there for all to see. Meanwhile, the mods have the right to do whatever they want.
OK I agree with you, so if one considered they had been "personally abused", wouldn't they alert the post, and let the Site Moderator decide on it? His/Her assessment hopefully would be unbiased right?
@fmf saidThe Moderators only moderate as a rule when the post has been alerted, or they see something that is really against the TOS, then it will vanish quicker than g-b-s's hair.
I don't alert posts. I think everyone's true colours should be left there for all to see. Meanwhile, the mods have the right to do whatever they want.
EDIT: No malice intended g-b-s, I have noticed my hair line is back a little further than it once was, only a matter of time. 🙂
-VR
@very-rusty saidWho's getting personal now?
The Moderators only moderate as a rule when the post has been alerted, or they see something that is really against the TOS, then it will vanish quicker than g-b-s's hair.
@handyandy saidHave a look at the EDIT, I am sure g-b-s will take it in the good natured way it was intended! 🙂 😛
Who's getting personal now?
My apology if I hit a nerve there Andy! 🙂
-VR
@very-rusty saidThen you owe Stees the apology. I have no hairline problems
Have a look at the EDIT, I am sure g-b-s will take it in the good natured way it was intended! 🙂 😛
My apology if I hit a nerve there Andy! 🙂
@handyandy saidLOL....If you say so Andy, I believe g-b-s will be ok with what I said or throw a remark back at me, he isn't as sensitive and out to get me as you are my old friend, of course I use the term very loosely! 😉
Then you owe Stees the apology. I have no hairline problems
-VR
@very-rusty saidDo you think we are out to get you?
LOL....If you say so Andy, I believe g-b-s will be ok with what I said or throw a remark back at me, he isn't as sensitive and out to get me as you are my old friend, of course I use the term very loosely! ;
@handyandy saidWhy would you bother saying what you did if you weren't? Why would you be jumping over everything I say you feel is out of the way or a personal attack on someone? Never mind the we lets just discuss you for now! 😉
Do you think we are out to get you?
-VR