28 Dec '20 09:47>
@drewnogal saidWhy, were you thumbing the poster? ๐
Nice idea.... have just swapped my thumb down (no 8) to an up ๐ฎ
@drewnogal saidWhy, were you thumbing the poster? ๐
Nice idea.... have just swapped my thumb down (no 8) to an up ๐ฎ
@divegeester saidThe down was for the poster, just jumping on the bandwagon for fun.
Why, were you thumbing the poster? ๐
@ghost-of-a-duke saidHey, you're still alive. My neighbour's dog didn't buy any snake oil and he's dead.
I won't be fooled by that again. You promised it would increase longevity and yet only gave me gout.
Oh, go on then. I'll take fourteen bottles.
@drewnogal saidThumb up for honesty!
The down was for the poster, just jumping on the bandwagon for fun.
The up was again for the poster, for perhaps showing that he possibly loves all of our community, in spite of their posts? ๐
@moonbus saidIn retrospect, maybe I shouldn't have consumed the snake oil.
Hey, you're still alive. My neighbour's dog didn't buy any snake oil and he's dead.
@divegeester saidUsing your opening post as an example it tells me that there are 8 idiots around, and 2 decent people.
Do you think it has an impact, if so on what?
@rajk999 saidSo where would that leave you calling people idiots? ๐ ๐
Using your opening post as an example it tells me that there are 8 idiots around, and 2 decent people.
@very-rusty saidTo thumbs down a post for no reason [the opening post contains nothing worthy of a thumbsdown], means that person is an idiot.
So where would that leave you calling people idiots? ๐ ๐
You do understand you can do that anymore right???
-VR
@ghost-of-a-duke saidFluffy was 118 in dog years, so maybe the lack of snake oil was incidental.
In retrospect, maybe I shouldn't have consumed the snake oil.
My thoughts are with Fluffy. (Your neighbours dog).
@rajk999 saidI am not saying your wrong, I am just saying that 'word' you used is not allowed.
To thumbs down a post for no reason [the opening post contains nothing worthy of a thumbsdown], means that person is an idiot.
@sonship saidAre you having issues sonship? ๐ ๐
@Very-Rusty
Testing, one, two, three. This is a test.
@moonbus saidTwo TDs?? All right, mixed conservatively with Jack Daniels.
Fluffy was 118 in dog years, so maybe the lack of snake oil was incidental.
It does matter how one consumes the snake oil. I believe it is meant to be applied externally, unless mixed liberally with Jack Daniels.
@moonbus saidJack Daniels is best drank straight with nothing in it. I know from my old drinking days! ๐ Of course everyone has their own ideas on how it is best drank.
Two TDs?? All right, mixed conservatively with Jack Daniels.
@very-rusty saidAuto-bot picked it up and agreed with me that these 8 people were idiots so the post was not removed. Its simple really.
I am not saying your wrong, I am just saying that 'word' you used is not allowed.
I am surprised auto-bot didn't pick it up. No one alerted it either, so most in here must have agreed with you.
-VR