Originally posted by shavixmirHmmm.. a valid view point.
I'm sick to death of this moronic attitude towards something that most of us deem normal, most of us do and those of us who don't really wish they did!
Why is it okay to talk about wars, the burning of children, flesh hanging limply from arms and legs, etc.
BUT when you mention oral sex your posts gets removed because the contents are seemingly ADUL ...[text shortened]... something useful. or laugh.
You bunch of no good, anal-retentive, whining sirloins of labia!
The way it seems to me, we as the human race are subconsciously telling each other that sex is bad and death and war are good. We don't talk about sex, because something deep down telling us we better not to.
And weighing out the benefits of each, I couldn't agree more.
Sex make us hungry animals. Death, in most cases causes lost of appetite. Therefore, the higher the death rate, the less obese our society becomes. Hell, it even beats the Atkins Diet.
Sex leads to accidental or planned babies - Over population. While death counteracts this and leads to the deceleration of the fast growing numbers of us, scumbags.
Personally, I tend to eat the females after sex, in order to maintain the crucial balance.
Originally posted by mokkoThanks for those really interesting thoughts. I agree that open communication between women and men, about sex and also about other relationship issues, is important and valuable. Both sexism against women *and* sexism against men can be reduced through open dialogue between people on these issues.
Wow! After sitting here reading through all this I'm not too sure where to begin. I have read far more offensive stuff in my life time than shavs post last night. It was not meant (I think) to be crude or disrespectfull. It was entertaining to say the least. I agree completely that if it's alright to discuss war, politics and religion then what's wrong with ...[text shortened]... rn site?
Well that's my thoughts on the subject, take it for what you will. Nice try Shav.
The children issue is truly complicated -- yes, parents shouldn't allow their children to have internet-accessible computers in their bedrooms or to use the net unsupervised, but in practice other people don't always follow this. So do we also need to have at least some boundaries on how we talk, just in case children read it? It's tricky as the majority of people who read one's posts are going to be adults, but yet a small minority will be children. I don't think talking about sex per se is a problem, but at the same time I try to keep it in the back of my mind that there's always the chance that children can read what I post. I also wonder if there are certain subcategories of sex that are particularly inappropriate for children or adolescents to read about, and they'd be better off hearing about those issues later on when they're adults.
Overall, I agree with the general idea that sex should be a less taboo topic than violence, since violence is bad whereas sex isn't.