25 Jun '15 05:00>
There should be no doubt that in the Bible, God commits evil acts that would in human standards, require an attorney. Atheists point out these evil acts to believers, and believers come to God's defense as a lawyer would. The problem is that believers in God are dealing with a dilemma: God, should be taking a plea bargain, because He is guilty.
Without having to quote numerous verses in the Bible, I will name a few:
God destroys Sodom.....including innocent children: Guilty.
God destroys the entire planet in the Noah flood...including children. Guilty.
God makes a bet with the devil to destroy Job, in the book of Job, and allows Job's family to be killed. Guilty.
God hardens the heart of pharoah 10 times, and the 10th plague kills the first born children of the land. Guilty.
The point is: In human standards, God would be guilty as sin. Any good lawyer would say to God that He needs to plea bargain, because all proof shows guilt. And any good lawyer would also say to God...."Hey God, you could have avoided all this mess if you had sacrificed your Son about 5,000 years sooner....why did you wait"?
God cannot be defended people. He committed acts of evil, in human standards. When an atheist challenges believers with words from the Bible......an honest believer should just throw his hands in the air and say that he has no idea. It is only when the believer uses Bible verses to try to be God's lawyer, that the believer sounds insane. Yes, insane.
I personally believe in a Creator that I call God, but......I use the name God because it's in the Bible. However, I am beginning to think that the Bible may just be man made. We have had over 1,000 posts in the Hell issue, debating the validity of how God could set up a Hell for unbelievers that lasts for an eternity. I think that is absurd. Maybe we should take a new, fresh look at our Bible.....and the possible BS that it is, and realize that God is so much more than words in a Bible.
God cannot be defended in a court of law for the evil He lays out on mankind in our Bible. Hitler did nothing compared to our God.
Without having to quote numerous verses in the Bible, I will name a few:
God destroys Sodom.....including innocent children: Guilty.
God destroys the entire planet in the Noah flood...including children. Guilty.
God makes a bet with the devil to destroy Job, in the book of Job, and allows Job's family to be killed. Guilty.
God hardens the heart of pharoah 10 times, and the 10th plague kills the first born children of the land. Guilty.
The point is: In human standards, God would be guilty as sin. Any good lawyer would say to God that He needs to plea bargain, because all proof shows guilt. And any good lawyer would also say to God...."Hey God, you could have avoided all this mess if you had sacrificed your Son about 5,000 years sooner....why did you wait"?
God cannot be defended people. He committed acts of evil, in human standards. When an atheist challenges believers with words from the Bible......an honest believer should just throw his hands in the air and say that he has no idea. It is only when the believer uses Bible verses to try to be God's lawyer, that the believer sounds insane. Yes, insane.
I personally believe in a Creator that I call God, but......I use the name God because it's in the Bible. However, I am beginning to think that the Bible may just be man made. We have had over 1,000 posts in the Hell issue, debating the validity of how God could set up a Hell for unbelievers that lasts for an eternity. I think that is absurd. Maybe we should take a new, fresh look at our Bible.....and the possible BS that it is, and realize that God is so much more than words in a Bible.
God cannot be defended in a court of law for the evil He lays out on mankind in our Bible. Hitler did nothing compared to our God.