Originally posted by epic0002Some RHP newbies aren't familiar with the en passant rule, but most players here know the rules of chess. I've never had to explain the en passant rule to a USCF tournament opponent, but that could be because I haven't played many young players, and I've never played in a scholastic tournament.
I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS WIERD THAT THE MOVE USUALLY CAME WITH AN EXPLANAITION.. EVEN IN TOUNAMENTS. BUT IN TWO YEARS ON RHP NOBODY HAS EVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT IT. DO PLAYERS USE IT ALOT ON HERE?
I feel the same thing about castling. It's kind of cheating.
Just when you have a mortal attack on you opponent's king, he cowardly escapes with it inte a safe spot and bring the rook forward in the light. It just destroys the position and your soon won game is turned into a lost one. Weird I would say.
And the still weirder thing about it is that every one accepts it as a proper move and never complains about it.
Not to mention queening...
Originally posted by epic0002I have seen at least two threads where someone thought they had mate or stalemate, but didn't due to e.p.
I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS WIERD THAT THE MOVE USUALLY CAME WITH AN EXPLANAITION.. EVEN IN TOUNAMENTS. BUT IN TWO YEARS ON RHP NOBODY HAS EVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT IT. DO PLAYERS USE IT ALOT ON HERE?
Thank you for shouting.
Originally posted by carjamI never say en passent and never say check or check mate either. In fact in most tournaments I play I would probably be told off (by the arbiter) for disturbing other players if I did.
It's often a game winner...it's polite to quote 'en passent'...when making the move..well i do anyway
I would assume if my opponent cannot tell he is in check (or that it is his turn to move or that I have taken his pawn e.p.) he does not deserve to be playing in the same tournament as me.