Go back
kingcaptured booted - Section 3(b)

kingcaptured booted - Section 3(b)

Only Chess

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kepler
kingcaptured seems a little odd in that respect. He didn't play that many games in his four years here and only had 13 in progress when he was booted. I have seen people playing almost half as many games at one time as kingcaptured played all the time he was here. Maybe he wasn't using an engine but cheating some other way? 3b doesn't just cover engine use.
Again, what is the point of cheating? What do you gain...false bragging rights? You do what you want to, but your chess rank on this site versus mine don't mean squat when it comes time to pay the bills each month and the taxman each year. Chess is entertainment, unless you are playing for a living. If you are playing for a living, you had better be good enough to do it without databases and engines. I just feel sorry for those who need to cheat to feel that they are a success at something.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kepler
kingcaptured seems a little odd in that respect. He didn't play that many games in his four years here and only had 13 in progress when he was booted. I have seen people playing almost half as many games at one time as kingcaptured played all the time he was here. Maybe he wasn't using an engine but cheating some other way? 3b doesn't just cover engine use.
He used an engine, Fritz. Even if one were to disregard the high correlation, there are very obvious examples of his engine use such as this (although obviously cases such as the one presented are rare, with the rook left trapped behind enemy lines).

Game 2156944

I think the number of engine users in the top tier of RHP has somewhat diminished, at least within the last year...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Yuga
He used an engine, Fritz. Even if one were to disregard the high correlation, there are very obvious examples of his engine use such as this (although obviously cases such as the one presented are rare, with the rook left trapped behind enemy lines).

Game 2156944

I think the number of engine users in the top tier of RHP has somewhat diminished, at least within the last year...
Yup, that looks fairly engine shaped. Just out of interest, how do you know it was Fritz he was using? I am assuming he didn't tell you!

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

out of interest -- if your're banned do you get your membership refunded?

if so, perhaps RHP should keep thier monney and make it blatantly clear that happens when they become a suscriber...

maybe, the thought of losing monney would discourage some going-to-be cheaters.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Aww, he was one of my favorite players. He was a tactical genius, err, Fritz is a tactical genius 🙂

Well, I really enjoyed a certain gajme of his posted not too long ago, but apparently I was just marveling at a computer, how disappointing.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sir Timothy
I suck + I don't cheat = now I know why my rating blows.

How many players above 2000 are honest?
i can not disagree with your first statement, but your query is moronic--honest & strong chess players do exist

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Shinidoki
out of interest -- if your're banned do you get your membership refunded?

if so, perhaps RHP should keep thier monney and make it blatantly clear that happens when they become a suscriber...

maybe, the thought of losing monney would discourage some going-to-be cheaters.
RHP can't hold the cash. All a user needs to do is decline the charge, have it reversed etc.

Next comes a lot of paper-work for RHP.

The cash is given back, and ties are cut. Would be nice to punish in this way, but it isn't realistic.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Patzergrl
I'd be more alarmed at the psychological state of someone who feels the need to cheat because a silly internet rating makes them feel better about themselves
True. Very true!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
RHP can't hold the cash. All a user needs to do is decline the charge, have it reversed etc.

Next comes a lot of paper-work for RHP.

The cash is given back, and ties are cut. Would be nice to punish in this way, but it isn't realistic.

P-
Hopefully RHP only has to refund a pro-rated share of the subscription.
Otherwise, there is no deterrant at all.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shortcircuit
Hopefully RHP only has to refund a pro-rated share of the subscription.
Otherwise, there is no deterrant at all.
time wasted?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Yuga
He used an engine, Fritz. Even if one were to disregard the high correlation, there are very obvious examples of his engine use such as this (although obviously cases such as the one presented are rare, with the rook left trapped behind enemy lines).

Game 2156944

I think the number of engine users in the top tier of RHP has somewhat diminished, at least within the last year...
The tactics commencing with move 19 are blowing my mind. I think most humans would not even have looked at some of those lines let alone bothered to calculate them out to determine their soundness and yes Rook trapped on c7 would just be avoided my most players.

Maybe this game is the one that tripped him up.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kepler
Yup, that looks fairly engine shaped. Just out of interest, how do you know it was Fritz he was using? I am assuming he didn't tell you!
I've analyzed (way too many; hundreds and hundreds of games of many of the top players here; I actually have ~ 600 RHP games in my personal database that are from games I was not a part of!), although those games are generally those of only the players I consider legitimate. And then the RHP database came out. 🙄Unfortunately my memory usually only registers dross such as the players’ names, rating, result, opening, and not so much the intricacies that would improve my play. 🙁 Generally I do post-game analysis with Fritz8 (the only engine that I have [with whatever weak engines it comes with]; I do post-game analysis by using infinite analysis, and line pruning; similar to the technique of ICCF players – personally, I think correspondence chess that allows use of engines is BS and requires very little real skill, merely work ethic).

I've played kingcaptured myself and it quickly became very clear that he was using an engine in both of our games.

I actually managed to obtain a winning position against him with white; the end position is winning (albeit I would need decent technique), but I resigned many games due to stress (sorry to my opponents!). But in this game below I was very, very lucky.

Game 2281320

Qh3-g2 is hilarious, no? He did have more compensation than I anticipated for the queen and I had to play reasonably accurately. Kxe4 would have been aesthetically pleasing, but, more likely, stupid, leading to unnecessary complications.

Our other game was a classic example of an engine simplifying the position in a way that I would never expect a human to. And he played such critical moves extremely quickly; of course, playing quickly or using a plethora of openings in any sense does not at all imply engine use. But it certainly gets my suspicions up!

Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't play or advocate for anyone to play the King Gambit but I don't think it is usual for your King to wander like that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Yuga
I've analyzed (way too many; hundreds and hundreds of games of many of the top players here; I actually have ~ 600 RHP games in my personal database that are from games I was not a part of!), although those games are generally those of only the players I consider legitimate. And then the RHP database came out. 🙄Unfortunately my memory usually only registers d ...[text shortened]... enings in any sense does not at all imply engine use. But it certainly gets my suspicions up!
getting the queen "trapped" in that way doesn't look human at all, simply because most players would reject it outright and not even bother to look further down complex tactical lines.

If such a move is sound I would rate it as highly supicious.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
I don't play or advocate for anyone to play the King Gambit but I don't think it is usual for your King to wander like that.
My king is wandering a bit in this KG. Game 3357510 is still in progress after I moved too quickly early on and made an error and now I am really struggling although not without counter play.

[No comments - in progress]

I find this often happens with me in KGs usually because I make a stupid mistake. Incidently I do advocate the KG - its a solid fun opening with wild tactical play.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.