Go back
Multiplayer Chess Game Dec 7th 2013

Multiplayer Chess Game Dec 7th 2013

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SwissGambit
[pgn]
[Event "Dec 7 2013 game"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2013.12.07"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Luke Myster and co"]
[Black "Fat Lady and co"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B96"]
[PlyCount "36"]
[SourceDate "2013.12.07"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 Nbd7 7. f4 Qc7 8. Qf3 e6 9. O-O-O b5 10. Bxb5 axb5 11. Ndxb5 Qb8 12. Kb1 Be7 13. Bxf6 N ...[text shortened]... e5 Bb7 15. Qg3 dxe5 16. fxe5 Nh5 17. Qg4 g6 18. Nd6+ Bxd6 {SG, 2013-12-12, 10:38 GMT-7}
[/pgn]
Originally posted by SwissGambit

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HikaruShindo
Originally posted by SwissGambit
[b][pgn]
[Event "Dec 7 2013 game"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2013.12.07"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Luke Myster and co"]
[Black "Fat Lady and co"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B96"]
[PlyCount "36"]
[SourceDate "2013.12.07"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 Nbd7 7. f4 Qc7 8. Qf3 e6 9. O-O-O b5 10. B ...[text shortened]... 3. Bxf6 Nxf6 14. e5 Bb7 15. Qg3 dxe5 16. fxe5 Nh5 17. Qg4 g6 18. Nd6+ Bxd6 19. Rxd6
[/pgn]
[/b]
19 ... 0-0

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
Not sure if GP meant to double up or retreat ( which doesn't seem his style ). The PGN is ambiguous. PM'ed him to find out.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Super-Dupper!!!
I just entered Rd1 intending Rhd1. Double up and see what happens.
The system played Rdd1.

It stands. No taking moves back even if it was not meant.

That is brilliant!!
The system perhaps should have said 'invalid PGN' but chose to move the
d6 Rook back to d1. Wow!

Swiss G. experiment with this. A new genre in chess problems.
Set up mates where two of the same pieces can go to the same square. (as above)
One stops a mate in one. The other allow a mates in one.
Play the move with the lazy notation as I just used and see what the system chooses.

It may have selected the d6 Rook because it was alread on the d-file.
What a fantastic bug.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just did a quick one.
If White plays 1.Rhc1 Black mates in one.
If White plays 1.Rcc1 White mates in one.



add the move 1.Rc1

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Anoter quickie.

1. R6-c3 is mate in one. 1.R2-c3 allows mate in one



now add 1.Rc3

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

OK this is the true test.

1.R4-c3 mates - 1.R2-c3 gets mated.



now add 1.Rc3



Knights? What about Knights?

Both Knights can go to d4, both Knights are one file away.



Now add 1.Nd4




More Knights - all 8 Knights can go to d4



adding 1.Nd4

7 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

You have to think like a programmer on this.

How will Russ implement moves in a PGN? He will scan the board, square by square, until he finds a piece that can make the move. At that point, he will have the program play it on the board, disregarding the fact that the move is ambiguous (this is typical of Russ' "shoot from the hip" coding style 🙂 ).

My guess is he will start somewhere on the lower left. Let's find the start square.



A1 it is. Where does he go from there? Let's remove Qa1 and find out.



It looks like he's going up the a-file. Let's test that theory.



Nailed it. So my next guess, he will go up to a8 and then b1 and up the b-file, etc.



Yep.

I think this explains all of GP's examples as well. Off I go to double check.

Vote Up
Vote Down



This is a test to make sure you can actually play a move like Qb8-b7. Looks like it works.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
Super-Dupper!!!
I just entered Rd1 intending Rhd1. Double up and see what happens.
The system played Rdd1.

It stands. No taking moves back even if it was not meant.

That is brilliant!!
The system perhaps should have said 'invalid PGN' but chose to move the
d6 Rook back to d1. Wow!

Swiss G. experiment with this. A new genre in chess problems ...[text shortened]...

It may have selected the d6 Rook because it was alread on the d-file.
What a fantastic bug.
Very noble of you GP but I think that the move should be allowed to be made as you intended. It's not as if you chose which rook or made a touch move with the wrong rook. I think in the interest of fair play the oppponents team should grant your team the takeback as it was the PGN system which made the error.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bebop5
Very noble of you GP but I think that the move should be allowed to be made as you intended. It's not as if you chose which rook or made a touch move with the wrong rook. I think in the interest of fair play the oppponents team should grant your team the takeback as it was the PGN system which made the error.
I would give him Rhd1 if he wants it. It doesn't feel right for an RHP bug to have an influence on the game.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Let's let the black team decide to keep the game moving. It's clear now what was intended. Just make the next black move.

1 edit



We don't need a site bug to defeat you!
...Rc8

Vote Up
Vote Down