Go back
Personal Chess Training

Personal Chess Training

Only Chess

6 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

There are more than 30 than have joined, but who have not moved yet.
A lot of students have joined and requested not to participate in endgame studies. They only want to work through tactical problems. We have the problems on our database ready to work, but it will be the second week of February before we have our software ready to distribute different types of problems.

So at present we are only working endgame paroblems. Soon we will add simple mates for beginners, mate in one, and mate in two.

We are asking for volunteers who are willing to work with beginners on these types of problems too. As the project grows it will require more volunteers. So if you would like to teach beginners how to mate with major pieces please message me.

We have a message board for everyone to start their own personal training journal. What are your plans? How do you intend to improve your game?

Thanks!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by petrovitch
A lot of students have joined and requested not to participate in endgame studies. They only want to work through tactical problems. We have the problems on our database ready to work, but it will be the second week of February before we have our software ready to distribute different types of problems.

So at present we are only working endgame parob ...[text shortened]... training journal.
What are your plans? How do you intend to improve your game?

Thanks![/b]
Game glitch (moves logging) is solved, but why set up piece games still don't have game history...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivan2908
Game glitch (moves logging) is solved, but why set up piece games still don't have game history...
Games don't for some. I take mine as examples.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Petrovitch has been tremendously helping my end game. Totally take advantage of this free training. He even emails you with advice.

10 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivan2908
Game glitch (moves logging) is solved, but why set up piece games still don't have game history...
I'm not sure about your problem. I'll check into it. It may still have to do with creation date. Everything on our end is still working. The most recent games I've examined don't have any problem with the moves.

I've put digrams of the position we are studying on our forum. Check this out and let me know if this is worth the effort.

http://personalchesstraining.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=Endgame

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by petrovitch
I'm not sure about your problem. I'll check into it. It may still have to do with creation date. Everything on our end is still working. The most recent games I've examined don't have any problem with the moves.

[b]I've put digrams of the position we are studying on our forum. Check this out and let me know if this is worth the effort.


http://personalchesstraining.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=Endgame[/b]
When I go to analyze board, instead of moves I get "Sorry, this game has no move history". It doesn't matter though, those problems are all available on your site (very nice and perspective site, by the way.)

Vote Up
Vote Down

it has been very helpful (if frustrating). I am starting to look at the relationship of the pieces differently. Although that stupid k-b-n vs k is a sonofa gun!

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by duecer
it has been very helpful (if frustrating). I am starting to look at the relationship of the pieces differently. Although that stupid k-b-n vs k is a sonofa gun!
I solved that one in 27 moves 😲

Game 4534513

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
I solved that one in 27 moves 😲

Game 4534513
The only thing that bothers me about this problem is that Jeremy Silman will not teach it. His excuse is that it rarely occurs in tournament chess. I have hundreds of examples on my database taken from grandmaster games. I think it teaches you how to use your pieces together as has been suggested.

It's difficult to learn, but don't you feel good after you've solved it?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
I solved that one in 27 moves 😲

Game 4534513
Nice. 32 moves for me.

Game 4538017

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
Nice. 32 moves for me.

Game 4538017
To make it easier to review these games I added some parameters to the url. For example,

www.personalchesstraining.com/main.php?request=replayer

If you want to see just your games then add:

&student=

and your student id

If you want to see all of the games from a certain position then add:

&fen=

and the fen id

If you want to see just a single game add:

&game=

and the game id


For example, if you want to see all of the games played with KBN v K then you would add:

&fen=18

Refresh the browser to get another instance of this set piece game.

I think everyone finds humor in the Saavedra position.

&fen=4

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by petrovitch
The only thing that bothers me about this problem is that Jeremy Silman will not teach it. His excuse is that it rarely occurs in tournament chess. I have hundreds of examples on my database taken from grandmaster games. I think it teaches you how to use your pieces together as has been suggested.

It's difficult to learn, but don't you feel good after you've solved it?
yes it does...plus it demonstrates the power of discovered checks...just the threat of it forces the other side to give sway. I used that threat a couple times to get black to to move where I wanted him.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
Nice. 32 moves for me.

Game 4538017
I remember I had one book that said it takes 37 moves from that position 😲 I am selling that book at the next garage sale 😡

Vote Up
Vote Down

36 moves for me,it took me ages to do!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mipmcpt
36 moves for me,it took me ages to do!!
I suck, still havn't got it😞