Originally posted by zniemann
I stand by my statement that someone who claims a completely undeserved timeout win, without attempting to contact the other person at all, is an unethical prick. There are rules, and there are ethics. Anyone can play a sport, but sportsmanship is not written into the rules. I always contact the other person several times before claiming a timeout win, a ...[text shortened]... ue (e.g., claiming a timeout 30 days after the 7 day timeout period)
[rest of post deleted]
How can you complain about a timeout loss, especially if it was due to connection problems. If your opponent had messaged you, how would you respond? He/she is then a prick for timing you out after a question was not responded to?
Your opponent may look at it another way. How about, I'm in a bad position, but this guy is going really, really deep to work out the win. The analysis is taking so long, he timed out. Now, do I allow him to make the !! move and win, even though it took longer than allowed?
That's the purpose of a time rule - to keep the game moving. There seems to be a belief by some on this site that once you get a winning position, you deserve to win no matter what move you make, or how long you take. There is a reason winning a won game has been called the most difficult thing in chess. You have to close the deal within the rules.