Originally posted by FabianFnas I just think he happened to delete th [ /b ] after the quote inside the frame.
No, it's happened to me before... not a trace of [ b ] or [ /b ] in sight and your post is completely bold. If I remember correctly, you add or remove [ b ] at the beginning of the text to bring about the opposite.
Originally posted by FabianFnas I just think he happened to delete th [ /b ] after the quote inside the frame.
No, there is no tag at all in my post. They're only in the quoted post and mine is not inside the quoted post. Somehow the software made it carry over.
Originally posted by exigentsky No, there is no tag at all in my post. They're only in the quoted post and mine is not inside the quoted post. Somehow the software made it carry over.
your "Originally posted" section contains two quoted posts, so maybe you copied and pasted two posts into the "Quoted Post" box on the "New Post" page.
if you deleted the trailing [ / b ] tag in the "Quoted Post" box, the previous [ b ] tag will turn all of the remaining text bold, including the text you yourself typed into the "Post" box.
Perhaps some of you are also cheaters. Cheaters acuse cheaters of cheating. Also non cheaters do that and some of the accused are really innocent. I therefor understand why Russ does not act.
Originally posted by gregs229 It's very difficult to comment on this without having access to this 'proof' of cheating that is mentioned.
I believe this must be made publicly available before any conclusions can be reached.
i would just like to see an official announcement from admins, something like: "no, sub x is not an engine user", "yes, sub x is an engine user" or "sub x is under investigation and resoults will be published soon" cause this could get into a really big witch hunt, and many people could leave this site 😳