Go back
Evolution of the human eye.

Evolution of the human eye.

Science

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
God and god are not the samething.
Kelly
What does that mean?

(+ you still haven’t made any counter arguments)

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
What do you think, KellyJay?

Do you think that eyes with blind spots are better or worse than eyes without them?

Nemesio
In an earlier post he basically implied that the blind spot gives us better eyes!!!! (by stating that we are “much better off with blind spots” -he refused to elaborate on why so -so I can only assume that he is implying that it is because it somehow makes our eyes better!!! -why else?)

-he never explained why this should be so and I bet you will never get a straight answer from him to this simple question of “why so” without him making reference to “god” or "God" (I don't know what the difference is supposed to be) or the Bible or a verse from the Bible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
What does that mean?

(+ you still haven’t made any counter arguments)
I'm telling you this point is very important to me.

God is the one and only God there is none other, while god can be
a piece of wood, or one of several gods. I'm trying to be specific here
with who we were talking about, the points that have to do with God
we can deal with after this.
Kelly

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
In an earlier post he basically implied that the blind spot gives us better eyes!!!! (by stating that we are “much better off with blind spots” -he refused to elaborate on why so -so I can only assume that he is implying that it is because it somehow makes our eyes better!!! -why else?)

-he never explained why this should be so and I bet you will ...[text shortened]... (I don't know what the difference is supposed to be) or the Bible or a verse from the Bible.
No I didn't.
Kelly

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
No I didn't.
Kelly
So you now agree that there is a flaw in our eyes?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
I'm telling you this point is very important to me.

God is the one and only God there is none other, while god can be
a piece of wood, or one of several gods. I'm trying to be specific here
with who we were talking about, the points that have to do with God
we can deal with after this.
Kelly
The difference is important to you but not the argument. The logical argument for any god/God is the same.

If you wish to present an argument for a deity it will be the same argument.

Using a capital G will not make your argument better.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
I'm telling you this point is very important to me.

God is the one and only God there is none other, while god can be
a piece of wood, or one of several gods. I'm trying to be specific here
with who we were talking about, the points that have to do with God
we can deal with after this.
Kelly
More preaching

Vote Up
Vote Down

You know what I hate? I hate ignorance. I especially object to those
who promote it.


I see you hate yourself. But then perhaps you are too ignorant to recognize your own ignorance, therefore you wouldn't be aware of the fact that you should hate yourself.

I love it.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
[b]You know what I hate? I hate ignorance. I especially object to those
who promote it.


I see you hate yourself. But then perhaps you are too ignorant to recognize your own ignorance, therefore you wouldn't be aware of the fact that you should hate yourself.

I love it.[/b]
The simple are easily pleased.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Which explains why you enjoy posting here.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
Which explains why you enjoy posting here.
Let me know when your recess is over so we can continue this conversation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
[b]You know what I hate? I hate ignorance. I especially object to those
who promote it.


I see you hate yourself. But then perhaps you are too ignorant to recognize your own ignorance, therefore you wouldn't be aware of the fact that you should hate yourself.

I love it.[/b]
hey, get off my turf buddy. Find your own niche to exploit.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
No I didn't.
Kelly
Yes, you said having eyes is better than not having eyes. I agree. It wasn't
entirely clear the way you wrote it, but I figured it out. Andrew Hamilton misunderstood.

Now, can you answer this very simple question:

Is having eyes with blind spots better or worse than having the same eyes without
them?

Nemesio

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
Yes, you said having eyes is better than not having eyes. I agree. It wasn't
entirely clear the way you wrote it, but I figured it out. Andrew Hamilton misunderstood.

Now, can you answer this very simple question:

Is having eyes with blind spots better or worse than having the same eyes without
them?

Nemesio
I'm going to go with "eyes without blind spots are better than eyes with blind spots", as blind-spot free eye will gather more information than the same eye with a blind spot. Considering the amount of information processing that goes on right now when processing vision from our blind-spotted eyes, the amount of extra information would have a negligible effect on our processing speed, but would have a measurable positive impact on our visual acuity.

Care to comment, KellyJay?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
hey, get off my turf buddy. Find your own niche to exploit.
Now THAT's funny!