Originally posted by sonhouseNo.
So your main thesis here is evolution exists but only to make whatever lifeform you are talking about, worse? So the human race as it existed 1000 years ago was somehow superior to the human race as a whole today? And by extension, the human race as is exists to day is superior to the human race that exists 1000 years from now? Is that the gist of your proposal?
Mine is from the beginning we were better, not so much now compared
to that.
Kelly
Originally posted by convectWhere would you look the fossils. ๐
Have you read my hypothesis, freely given, that you could use to verify this claim?
If evolution really is a running down, you should be able to prove (probably using molecular biology or genetics techniques) that the "irreducibly complex" systems like the bacterial flagellum came *before* what biologists now consider to be their precursors like the type ...[text shortened]... every biological system started in a more perfect state, and degraded to a less perfect one.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayIt's not so much that it is imperfect, KellyJay. It's that it is avoidably more flawed. It's obvious
Again, imperfect design, you believe the work as a whole the entire
human body lasting over time is imperfect due to a single small
blind spot that may or may not have a purpose you do not understand
as of yet.
Kelly
that there's no problem whatsoever in designing a camera eye without a blind spot, so why design
one with a blind spot?
How does designing something that is avoidably more flawed not reflect on the designer?
Nemesio