@KellyJay saidScience is based on doubt, on proving hypotheses. So I seriously doubt your GODDIDIT solution.
And yet you accept that the symbiotic nature found in the genetic code came about not through design but undirected chemical processes.
The nearest I could get to your theology is maybe a god set up the laws of physics in our budding universe that just made it amenable to life.
THAT we also cannot either prove or disprove so as far as humanity goes, either kind of theology gives some kind of explanation for how life got here. And both cannot be right at the same time at least in THIS universe.
@sonhouse saidWell doubt away! If you get near the truth you will blow on passed it.
Science is based on doubt, on proving hypotheses. So I seriously doubt your GODDIDIT solution.
The nearest I could get to your theology is maybe a god set up the laws of physics in our budding universe that just made it amenable to life.
THAT we also cannot either prove or disprove so as far as humanity goes, either kind of theology gives some kind of explanation for how life got here. And both cannot be right at the same time at least in THIS universe.
@sonhouse saidWell, here is hoping you don't turn science into dogma but allow its ever-changing nature make you realize you are not seeking truth, just something new.
good luck with your plagiarized 7 day creation tale, its a thousand years older than Jewish and Christian theology.
@Oblation-Ants saidhttps://phys.org/news/2026-03-ryugu-asteroid-samples-dna-rna.html
On the 7th day was no creation.
Sample and return analysis shows complex molecules associated with RNA and DNA which is not saying they found DNA or RNA
but it does say a lot about the building blocks of life.
@wildgrass saidTruth can be brushed off as anything but.
Genesis works perfectly fine as a metaphor. The scientists don't care.
@KellyJay saidOh, like Jesus walked on water? Fed 5000 with one fish? Burning bush talked?
True, but if you cannot point them out, all you are doing is showing baseless animosity.
Funny how those things only happened once in 3000 years.
@sonhouse saidIf they were common practices, anyone could do them, since they are not God-given miracles that set such things outside normal human activities for God alone. These things were written in the lifetimes of people who were there; you only see the skeptics announcing no, who were people who opposed God. You will always find a reason to reject things, even if you have to make things up to do it.
Oh, like Jesus walked on water? Fed 5000 with one fish? Burning bush talked?
Funny how those things only happened once in 3000 years.
@KellyJay saidI'll continue to live writhing in sin.
If they were common practices, anyone could do them, since they are not God-given miracles that set such things outside normal human activities for God alone. These things were written in the lifetimes of people who were there; you only see the skeptics announcing no, who were people who opposed God. You will always find a reason to reject things, even if you have to make things up to do it.