31 Jul 17
Originally posted by @christopher-albonWe're in 3 and asleep in the fourth ... except sometime when we dream .
We're in the 3.
Did you know the easiest way to do your laces up is one loop away, one towards and then swap them over in one movement?
31 Jul 17
Originally posted by @christopher-albonThe 3rd is inanimate. The 'force of animation' could be considered the 4th
Seems so. The rest of us seem quite content in the 3rd. Hope you find happiness in your 4.
01 Aug 17
Originally posted by @christopher-albonDoes this mean there are an infinite number of dimensions?
There's no 3 in the 3rd. Only a probability of having one which is what drives time. There's also no 4 in the 4th and so on. So we can expect time or animation in each of the dimensions.
If you need a 4 and 2 for defining a 3, and then a 5 and 3 for defining a 4 (and so on), wouldn't it be necessary for there to be an infinite number of dimensions?
For example, if there are only 11 dimensions...
how could you define the 11th without a 12th?
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12466
01 Aug 17
Originally posted by @christopher-albonOh, so you're robbie. Well, bog off back to your sub-Sassenach servitude, you bracken-smoking teuchter.
Take it to the douchebag forum spanky.
- Joined
- 12 Jul 17
- Moves
- 1824
Originally posted by @lemon-limeDunno. Has to be finite then I reckon. Which makes sense if you only smash perfection to tiny pieces instead of running every possibility.
Does this mean there are an infinite number of dimensions?
If you need a 4 and 2 for defining a 3, and then a 5 and 3 for defining a 4 (and so on), wouldn't it be necessary for there to be an infinite number of dimensions?
For example, if there are only 11 dimensions...
how could you define the 11th without a 12th?
My guess is, and it's only a guess, that it has something to do with the number of creatures in existence.
02 Aug 17
1 edit
Originally posted by @wolfgang59What strikes me odd are people like yourself who say that the idea of God is crazy but then grab onto theories about how life forms in the universe could have seeded life on earth.
God is as logical or as illogical as the house-elf that lives in my cupboard.
Very strange.
These same people also have no trouble conceptualizing other dimensions and life forms that may be completely alien to us but have trouble believing in God because they cannot see or hear him.
02 Aug 17
Originally posted by @lemon-limeThe 12th is still 'forming'
Does this mean there are an infinite number of dimensions?
If you need a 4 and 2 for defining a 3, and then a 5 and 3 for defining a 4 (and so on), wouldn't it be necessary for there to be an infinite number of dimensions?
For example, if there are only 11 dimensions...
how could you define the 11th without a 12th?
02 Aug 17
Originally posted by @lemon-limeBy showing evidence to the contrary.
Just out of curiosity...
How would one go about proving (or disproving) the belief of a disbelief?
03 Aug 17
1 edit
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelIn order for a 12th to form there would need to be a 13th. But a 13th is defined by a 12th and 14th. And so on.
The 12th is still 'forming'
03 Aug 17
Originally posted by @lemon-limeAnd so fourth...
In order for a 12th to form there would need to be a 13th. But a 13th is defined by a 12th and 14th. And so on.
...teenth.
03 Aug 17
Originally posted by @christopher-albonWhen we think of our 3 dimensions + time we are talking the ability to move, like move up/down, say call that dimension one, move left/right, call it dimension two, and forwards and backwards, call that dimension 3 and needing time as a dimension to allow movement at all, no time, no movement, without time, the universe is just one individual picture and adding time allows new pictures with slightly different movements to be recorded.
There's no 3 in the 3rd. Only a probability of having one which is what drives time. There's also no 4 in the 4th and so on. So we can expect time or animation in each of the dimensions.
Does that jive with your understanding?
- Joined
- 12 Jul 17
- Moves
- 1824
07 Aug 17
Originally posted by @sonhouseThanks Sonhouse. I get the typical dimension view thing as the number of simultaneous aspects of an object one can observe. I just can't think of a use for it.
When we think of our 3 dimensions + time we are talking the ability to move, like move up/down, say call that dimension one, move left/right, call it dimension two, and forwards and backwards, call that dimension 3 and needing time as a dimension to allow movement at all, no time, no movement, without time, the universe is just one individual picture and a ...[text shortened]... es with slightly different movements to be recorded.
Does that jive with your understanding?
What if it's not a physical universe but a mental one. Would we still have dimensionality or would it be more likely entwined with perception and/or individualism?
08 Aug 17
Originally posted by @ogbYou mean that they sell Sim Universes in Wall Marts in a higher dimension, simulating galaxies, solar systems, planets, you and me?
The universe could be a great big Sim City
And the people playing this Sim Universe are not aware that they, in turn, is a simulation playing Sim Multiverse, who in turn...😲