2 edits
In this discussion there really isn't a way, only a belief.
I've given you reasons why I question the belief that it is not time, but some
physical distortion taking place. I don’t believe you can go out of phase
with the rest of the universe and not actually be displaced from it at the same
time. While it has been shown by more people than just me that the material
world can be affected to the point of throwing off timing of devices, I have not
seen anyone or thing time travel except between the ears of some.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayI think that you would do well to read a few texts on relativity. You clearly do not understand the basic concepts behind it.
In this discussion there really isn't a way, only a belief.
I've given you reasons why I question the belief that it is not time, but some
physical distortion taking place. I don’t believe you can go out of phase
with the rest of the universe and not actually be displaced from it at the same
time. While it has been shown by more people than just me that ...[text shortened]... devices, I have not
seen anyone or thing time travel except between the ears of some.
Kelly
There is no time travel involved, nor is there even disconnection between timelines.
You have repeatedly talked about not 'seeing' something, and mentioning that it is 'between the ears of some', yet every effect that has been mentioned, is observable - and you can observe it and have observed it, yourself.
As far as I can tell, that last sentence in your post can be nothing but a deliberate strawman. I am left wondering why.
Originally posted by twhiteheadI agree there is no time travel or a disconnection between time lines.
I think that you would do well to read a few texts on relativity. You clearly do not understand the basic concepts behind it.
There is no time travel involved, nor is there even disconnection between timelines.
You have repeatedly talked about not 'seeing' something, and mentioning that it is 'between the ears of some', yet every effect that has been m ...[text shortened]... ast sentence in your post can be nothing but a deliberate strawman. I am left wondering why.
Kelly
2 edits
Originally posted by twhiteheadI think this post is misleading. I will try to restate more accurately:
Well under relativity, time is all relative, so every observer experiences a different timeline. But all those timelines interact in a single continuum.
Every observer passes through "universal time" at the same rate; however the rate at which things happen to a particular observer and around him - including his subjective experience - with respect to "universal time" changes with velocity.
One timeline, but as observers progress along the timeline their sense of "local time" - how fast physical events occur with respect to "universal time" will vary with velocity in space.
2 edits
Originally posted by FabianFnasThink what would happen if you went into a timestream one nanosecond ahead of everyone else. Light would not be able to reach you from more than a foot away. Someone could stumble into you and not know it, you would always be in that other person's future, no light from that time stream could reach you, unless it was less than one foot away. (c=~ one foot (1/3 of a meter) per nanosecond)
When I change course, I'm still visible to others? I just don't disappear?
Conversely, your universe would be one third of a meter bigger than your body. Anything outside of that bubble would be in your past and therefore invisible as well. So a leaf could drift into your bubble and you would see it but when it got any further away, it would disappear. You would have a devil of a time finding food and water!
It would be like being extremely nearsighted but no lens would help. I would suggest crawling.