Originally posted by @eladar
Total BS, unless of course you claim that evolutionary science taught in schools should be only taught with the disclaimer that the theories are simply beliefs based on evidence found and not necessarily the truth.
Are you supportive of that disclaimer in every text book?
I would agree to a statement to the effect that the available evidence is massively coherently in favor of evolution's actually having happened, and that no evidence supports the claim of Creationism.
Same for the claim that the Earth is a globe, not flat.
Same for the claim that the universe is very old, on the order of 14 billion years, that the Earth is old, on the order of roughly half that. Same that life on Earth did not appear all at the same time, both simple and complex. The available evidence is massively coherently in favor of the scientific account of the ages of the universe and of the Earth and of the appearance of simple and complex life forms over deep time, and, for all that, it is just a theory.
I have no problem with prefacing electrical engineering textbooks with a disclaimer which says in effect, when you flip the switch the light goes on because that's a fact, and Maxwell's equations are just a theory.
Same for text books on aircraft design and bridge building: steel has a tensile strength superior to aluminum, that's a fact; atoms and chemical bonds are just a theory.
Etc.
This is exactly the disclaimer the Church demanded be added to Copernicus's work on astronomy, that it is just a theory. If such a disclaimer makes you happy, I have no objection to its being added to school books, along with a reference to the case of Copernicus.
You know that the Earth goes round the sun, not v.v., and this is just a theory. It is something more than belief or opinion.