Go back
planet found outside the Milky Way

planet found outside the Milky Way

Science

Vote Up
Vote Down

I have an enduring feeling that at some point there will be a society in which we have things figured out. We get along. We understand the basic rules. However, there's no plausible reason why this advanced society would think intergalactic travel is feasible or necessary.

Currently, we are considering a trip to Mars as a one way adventure. I googled it, and Mars is 4.2x10-5 light years from us. In scales of our galaxy, though, it's really close. In scales of our galaxy, it's really cheap. In scales of our galaxy, it's logistically orders of magnitude more manageable. If we could travel at the speed of light, which may be possible with enormous energy inputs in the far far future, it would be a quick trip.

Someone pointed out that there are 3 million habitable planets in the Milky Way. If we had 10,000 habitable spaceships and every one of those could travel at the speed of light, it would take millions of years to visit all of them.

Intergalactic travel is a fun concept to think about but it's a pipe dream. A mission to Andromeda at the speed of light? We'd have no power, no support, for millions of years.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
I have an enduring feeling that at some point there will be a society in which we have things figured out. We get along. We understand the basic rules. However, there's no plausible reason why this advanced society would think intergalactic travel is feasible or necessary.

Currently, we are considering a trip to Mars as a one way adventure. I googled it, and Mars is 4.2x ...[text shortened]... A mission to Andromeda at the speed of light? We'd have no power, no support, for millions of years.
wormholes

Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
I have an enduring feeling that at some point there will be a society in which we have things figured out. We get along. We understand the basic rules. However, there's no plausible reason why this advanced society would think intergalactic travel is feasible or necessary.

Currently, we are considering a trip to Mars as a one way adventure. I googled it, and Mars is 4.2x ...[text shortened]... A mission to Andromeda at the speed of light? We'd have no power, no support, for millions of years.
Before tackling Andromeda we've got plenty to explore in our own galaxy to keep us busy for countless centuries. Getting to nearest stars is not exactly impossible even with sub-light speed if you're able to slowly accelerate to relativistic speeds, and with proper magnetic shielding. And now some physicists theorize that super-light speed may actually be possible by shrinking the local space-time fabric. Methinks it's way too early to conclude what is or is not possible. But what's certain is that sooner or later a super-volcano or an asteroid will bring us mass extinction right here on Earth.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Once the James webb is launched ( next month) there will be many more planets found OUTSIDE the milky way !!

Vote Up
Vote Down

@lemondrop said
wormholes
flux capacitors

Vote Up
Vote Down

@bunnyknight said
Before tackling Andromeda we've got plenty to explore in our own galaxy to keep us busy for countless centuries. Getting to nearest stars is not exactly impossible even with sub-light speed if you're able to slowly accelerate to relativistic speeds, and with proper magnetic shielding. And now some physicists theorize that super-light speed may actually be possible by sh ...[text shortened]... at sooner or later a super-volcano or an asteroid will bring us mass extinction right here on Earth.
Hot take alert: I think our species survives both a super volcano and an asteroid.

Vote Up
Vote Down

This may be the most scienterrific of all threads in the Science forum.

Just think: Somewhere out there, on a planet far, far away...there is someone sittin' back, twistin' up something maybe even better than what we have here and asking themselves: "Are we alone."

1 edit

@Liljo

The only science I am concerned with is why you have a 2100 rating from beating up on 1500's...

You do know your profile shows us who you play right?
Average opponent rating...1543

Dude...

Vote Up
Vote Down

@contenchess said
@Liljo

The only science I am concerned with is why you have a 2100 rating from beating up on 1500's...

You do know your profile shows us who you play right?
Average opponent rating...1543

Dude...
I don't have any idea how those things are computed. And I've never challenged anyone to a chess game on RHP. Well, except some blowhard that used to be on here blathering all the time whose name I won't mention, but whose initials were Duchess something-or-other.

I have found breaks from my two jobs and offered a game to any takers. I've played some very highly rated players and fared okay. I've played some very low rated players as well, but it was them that challenged me.

Average rating of 1543? Cool!


@Liljo

Just messing with you.

I like you and your politics 😉


@contenchess said
@Liljo

Just messing with you.

I like you and your politics 😉
No worries!
Yours as well C'Chess. Have a great Thanksgiving!


@Liljo

Thanksgiving means Beer.

I'm happy 😊

Vote Up
Vote Down

@contenchess said
You do know your profile shows us who you play right?
Average opponent rating...1543

Dude...
another example of RHP providing valuable statistics to it's players..

Vote Up
Vote Down

@ogb

You're very strong with strong opponents.

One day I'll be at your level 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
Hot take alert: I think our species survives both a super volcano and an asteroid.
Yes, that's possible; but even a minor event would cause mass starvation, killing off 90% of humanity. And if only a few thousand survive in their underground bunkers, how long would it take humanity to fully recover? 1000 years or more? And would this new humanity Version 2.0 be smarter and better than V 1.0? Hard to say.