Originally posted by FMFTaking enemy lives in war is not taking innocent life. Even killing enemy women and children is not evil.
So taking innocent lives with a weapon that clearly maximizes the taking of innocent lives, and intentionally so [in itself arguably the ultimate kind of "terrorist act"... as you said "...When the locals fear us enough..."] jives with your 'sanctity of unique distinct innocent human lives' thing?
Originally posted by EladarIs this it's ok to turn cities into glass argument also valid [as a rationale, not in terms of whether you like it] for other countries around the world who think nuclear attacks on the U.S. might bring an end to the harm they feel they suffer as a result of the actions of the U.S. and its proxies?
We should have nuked Tehran during the time of the hostage crisis. If we had, maybe we could have avoided this terrorist crap. Perhaps a few more islamic cities turned to glass would be reqired.
Originally posted by EladarSo do you believe that the taking of the lives of American non-combatant men, women and children in this "war" you are talking about is "not taking innocent life" and "is not evil"?
Taking enemy lives in war is not taking innocent life. Even killing enemy women and children is not evil.
Originally posted by apathistIf you believe it's a human life inside than what right is there that allows one person to just want another to die and it's okay?
A deep and divisive subject.
Should a woman have a right to choose? What are the boundaries, and why?
What about the man? What rights for him?
Originally posted by FMFWar is war. If we do not defend our own it is our fault. If we do mot kill the ememy it is our fault.
So do you believe that the taking of the lives of American non-combatant men, women and children in this "war" you are talking about is "not taking innocent life" and "is not evil"?
1 edit
FMF: So do you believe that the taking of the lives of American non-combatant men, women and children in this "war" you are talking about is "not taking innocent life" and "is not evil"?You appear to have dodged my specific question.
Originally posted by Eladar
War is war. If we do not defend our own it is our fault. If we do mot kill the ememy it is our fault.
"In war", is killing non-combatant Americans "not taking innocent life"? And "in war", is it "not evil" for America's enemies to kill non-combatant Americans?
"In war", according to you, is killing non-combatant Americans "not taking innocent life"? And "in war", is it "not evil" for America's enemies to kill non-combatant Americans?
Originally posted by FMFI answered your question. In war there are no non-combatants. Those are terms people like to throw around before and after wars.
You appear to have dodged my specific question.
"In war", according to you, is killing non-combatant Americans "not taking innocent life"? And "in war", is it "not evil" for America's enemies to kill non-combatant Americans?