Absurd REALLY stupid stories in the bible.

Absurd REALLY stupid stories in the bible.

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
16 Jul 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
My real name is JESUS and you are in a heap of trouble. Prepare for Hellfire! ๐Ÿ˜€

The Instructor
Yeah... That's just pathetic.

Child of the Novelty

San Antonio, Texas

Joined
08 Mar 04
Moves
618677
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
My real name is JESUS and you are in a heap of trouble. Prepare for Hellfire! ๐Ÿ˜€
The Instructor
No, your name is Fruitcake (filled with nuts). ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by googlefudge
Yeah... That's just pathetic.
I was being facetious. However, the fact that you are in serious trouble and heading for hellfire is no joke. Why don't you seek the truth by study of the Holy Bible. Seek out some Christians to study with so you can ask questions and get feedback and see what their idea of being Christian is all about. It may be difficult to find real Christians at first, but if you really seek God, you will find Him and Christians to fellowship with and you will not regret the day you started looking.

The Instructor

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by googlefudge
No, I am still 'attacking faith as [you] experience it'.

Any belief that is not "justified by the evidence" and is thus believed on faith and I oppose
and argue against that.

Your belief need not be absolute, simply unjustified by the available evidence.

As there is not a single shred of evidence for the existence of the bible god then any positive
belief that it exists is unjustified and held based on faith as I define it.
"simply unjustified by the available evidence."
what is enough for you? if one loves his spouse, what is enough evidence for the other to "know" of his love, or simply believe, justified as you say?


"Your belief need not be absolute, simply unjustified by the available evidence."
"We" do have evidence. someone at some point saw someone named jesus get born, live, preach, do some funky miracles, die and resurrected. is this evidence enough to hold in court? no. is it enough for one to make a scientific paper on it? no. it is enough however to spark a belief system that is held in some form by over a billion people.

someone else lived in asia and became the buddha. the profed Muhammad came and started islam. there is some basis to all religions and that is enough to sustain faith, just as your wife (any wife) caring for you when you're sick is enough to sustain belief she loves you

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
I was being facetious. However, the fact that you are in serious trouble and heading for hellfire is no joke. Why don't you seek the truth by study of the Holy Bible. Seek out some Christians to study with so you can ask questions and get feedback and see what their idea of being Christian is all about. It may be difficult to find real Christians at firs ...[text shortened]... tians to fellowship with and you will not regret the day you started looking.

The Instructor
what makes you think googlefudge is heading for hellfire, are you qualified to make that judgement? are you heading for hellfire?

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by stellspalfie
what makes you think googlefudge is heading for hellfire, are you qualified to make that judgement? are you heading for hellfire?
heh, you're humoring him.

someone who has decided to sign his posts with "the instructor" to better illustrate how much he cares about our opinions, any opinion that is against his.

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
"simply unjustified by the available evidence."
what is enough for you? if one loves his spouse, what is enough evidence for the other to "know" of his love, or simply believe, justified as you say?


"Your belief need not be absolute, simply unjustified by the available evidence."
"We" do have evidence. someone at some point saw someone named jesus ge ...[text shortened]... (any wife) caring for you when you're sick is enough to sustain belief she loves you
a husband has first hand evidence that his wife cares for him. he sees her everyday and builds a huge catalog he can refer to, to support his assertion that she cares. his friends and family also see their relationship and can help verify and corroborate what he sees and feels.

we have zero first hand evidence for the birth of jesus or any of the things that happen in his life. reading about jesus's exploits and calling them evidence is no more credible than reading about achillies in the illiad and believing that he was real and also the son of a god.

if may be enough to spark belief in some people. but it shouldnt.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by stellspalfie
a husband has first hand evidence that his wife cares for him. he sees her everyday and builds a huge catalog he can refer to, to support his assertion that she cares. his friends and family also see their relationship and can help verify and corroborate what he sees and feels.

we have zero first hand evidence for the birth of jesus or any of the thi ...[text shortened]... and also the son of a god.

if may be enough to spark belief in some people. but it shouldnt.
she could simply take care for him until the day the evil aliens that control her give her the order to kill. anyone can have hidden agenda. ultimately, you do not know. not in the way you know that hidrogen has one proton in his nucleus.

Zellulรคrer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
17 Jul 13

The first-living-thing one is a common folk tale motif. "Shibboleth" refers to identifying foreigners, for whom it was particularly hard to pronounce. Still commonly applied around the world ... The value of the OT lies in its human, all-too human quality.

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
she could simply take care for him until the day the evil aliens that control her give her the order to kill. anyone can have hidden agenda. ultimately, you do not know. not in the way you know that hidrogen has one proton in his nucleus.
evil aliens is a possibility, but because of the lack of evidence its highly unlikely. however there is a mountain of evidence suggesting she does love him.

the logic regarding evil aliens could also be used for the hydrogen proton. maybe evil aliens have made fake hydrogen and everything we know about hydrogen atoms is false. its so unlikely as there is zero evidence that it would be silly to believe in the evil alien, hydrogen theory. its best (especially when it comes to extraordinary claims) to only believe in what we have solid evidence for.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by stellspalfie
evil aliens is a possibility, but because of the lack of evidence its highly unlikely. however there is a mountain of evidence suggesting she does love him.

the logic regarding evil aliens could also be used for the hydrogen proton. maybe evil aliens have made fake hydrogen and everything we know about hydrogen atoms is false. its so unlikely as the ...[text shortened]... ially when it comes to extraordinary claims) to only believe in what we have solid evidence for.
there is a slight difference between a human being having hidden motives and faking a behaviour pattern and aliens changing all the hidrogen in the universe. which is irrelevant anyway because we don't care if the hidrogen ever had two protons (we know something has two protons it is called helium). we just know that hidrogen has properties, properties that do not change, and that it has one proton in its nucleus.


"only believe in what we have solid evidence for."\
yes, when it comes to science. otherwise, we are willing to accept insuficient evidence or even none at all all the time. what evidence do you have that a monet painting is "good"? why would you care? if it makes you happy, it is good.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53227
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
heh, you're humoring him.

someone who has decided to sign his posts with "the instructor" to better illustrate how much he cares about our opinions, any opinion that is against his.
And I see no refutation of that statement by this so-called self styled pathetic shadow of 'the instructor'.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by sonhouse
And I see no refutation of that statement by this so-called self styled pathetic shadow of 'the instructor'.
seriously, you are still surprised that he doesn't refute his opponents? that when he tries to reply, his posts reek of ignorance and mockery?


can't you find someone else to discuss spirituality other than this wacko? or is it the fact that he is so low on the intellectual ladder that he actually is the ground beneath it, and it makes you feel good about yourself "debating" with someone who seems to be barely able to remember breathing?


are you all holding your breath waiting for him to challenge you intellectually? are you disappointed and surprised he doesn't?

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
17 Jul 13

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
there is a slight difference between a human being having hidden motives and faking a behaviour pattern and aliens changing all the hidrogen in the universe. which is irrelevant anyway because we don't care if the hidrogen ever had two protons (we know something has two protons it is called helium). we just know that hidrogen has properties, properties tha ...[text shortened]... ve that a monet painting is "good"? why would you care? if it makes you happy, it is good.
i was actually comparing aliens faking hydrogen with your assertion that aliens could be controlling a wife, not comparing them to a wife having hidden agendas.

aliens controlling things has zero evidence. a wife having hidden agendas is something that happens frequently (as does husbands with hidden agendas) so we do have a presidence and evidence that it can happen.

as claiming a wife cares for a husband is not an extraordinary claim, its not unreasonable for a husband to believe it. even if there is a possibility that he is wrong.

as i mentioned before the events in the illiad were thought of as historical, they were passed by word of mouth until the day homer wrote them down. some historians still think it was based on real events. the bible is no more true or false then the illiad. there could well have been a troy, just as there could be a jesus. a seige could have happened, just as jesus could have spread the word of god............there is not a lot of evidence for these things, but as they are not extraordinary claims its not such a big deal. but when people start changing the laws of physics and throwing zeus and god performing magic into the mix things are getting so extraordinary that it would be crazy to believe them just because its written down, we should demand physical evidence and proof.

Zellulรคrer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
17 Jul 13

So, Sonhouse, do you consider fairytales to be "really stupid"?