Originally posted by no1marauder
Those sea level changes were gradual and took place over thousands of years. I find the creation of similar myths of a single, cataclysmic event springing up all over the globe due to this gradual process to be most unlikely. I feel the most logical explanation is the "proto-myth" theory.
I think the "proto-myth" idea is interesting. Can you recommend a site that goes through it?
Since my deconversion from xtianity, I've always assumed that the other flood myths that I encountered had different origins(most of them were from ancient S. and C. American texts, since Spanish was one of my majors in college).
I assumed that within regions different peoples may have drawn their flood stories from a similar source, but not every people in the world.
The idea is, much like the "proto-myth" hypothesis, that major flood events are so cataclysmic that recollections of them make an indelible mark on a culture's cultural history. Over time these accounts become legends and eventually, as parsimony would have it, one either dominates the others or they all sort of meld into a super-diluvian myth.
Since floods happen in most places in the world, it should not surprise us that "flood-myths" are common. If a people lives in an arid or high, mountainous region, where flooding is impossible or extremely unlikely, then the myth may have been adopted from another group somewhere in the wider region or descended from an earlier group from which these people are an off-shoot.
Still I would like to see some of these myths from widely-different parts of the world so that I can look at the specific similarities and decide whether I think it lends credibility to many different floods or one unique flood.