14 Jul '13 05:01>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
Originally posted by apathistThen you have a countless number of 'belief systems' and the term has been rendered useless.
[b]Have you considered the possibility that babies and rocks are atheists?
Yes. Then I checked dictionaries and encyclopedias to see if I understood the words and the concepts. Turns out they aren't.
Is your lack of belief in Santa Claus a belief system? Do you have scientific evidence that Santa Claus does not exist?
Of course, and no.[/b]
Originally posted by Great King RatNo, believing that there is only one of something, more than one of
It always amazes me that religious people would want to equate their belief with that of the atheist. I mean, "believing" in god is something entirely different than "not believing" in god, isn't it? The way I understand it, theists don't just look at the world and say "oh well, based on emotionless, empiric evidence I have no choice but to come to th ...[text shortened]... e that you need to make everybody "a believer"?
How pitiful.
Originally posted by apathistPlease explain why they aren't.
Yes. Then I checked dictionaries and encyclopedias to see if I understood the words and the concepts. Turns out they aren't.
Originally posted by KellyJaySo do you agree with apathist that your lack of belief in Santa is a belief system? Do you agree that you look at all the other variables in the light of your lack of belief in Santa?
.... as soon as you choose to look at all the other variables in the light of your beliefs about that value than you without a doubt have a belief system.
Originally posted by twhiteheadYouTube
Please explain why they aren't.
[b]Of course, and no.
What about your lack of belief in Shingitzu, prior to my telling you of him?
I am trying to establish whether your lack of belief becomes a belief system only when you consciously decide not to believe.
Would you describe all monotheists as athiests-1 ie athiests for all gods but one?
Would ...[text shortened]... tricted to supernatural entities or are they our opinions on the validity of any truth claim?[/b]
Originally posted by RJHindsAnd I ignored you, for you are ...
I explained this already. NObody Does It Better for I am...
The Instructor
Originally posted by KellyJayI have no problem with calling atheism a "belief". I think it's pointless - just like calling my non-believe in Manbearpig a believe is pointless - but I have no problem with it.
No, believing that there is only one of something, more than one of
something, or none of something is still believing, and if you believe
that the correct value means all other variables are to be looked at one
way over another because of that correct value, as soon as you choose to
look at all the other variables in the light of your beliefs about that value
than you without a doubt have a belief system.
Kelly
Originally posted by apathistAll babies are born as implicit atheists. As is everyone who is unfamiliar with theism, or who is incapable of conceptualizing it. Babies can be expected to subsequently grow up to be either explicit atheists or theists.
There are those who believe that atheism is best defined as a lack of belief in gods. Well, babies and rocks don't believe in gods.
By using dictionaries and encyclopedias, it turns out that atheism requires belief.
I'm pretty sure than must be correct, unless you have scientific evidence that gods cannot exist? :/
Originally posted by apathist"What's yer point."
No, but there'll probably be some nearby. Lamps, too, and a basin to vomit in. What's yer point.
Originally posted by rwingett"Atheism is not a belief. It is a lack of belief."
All babies are born as implicit atheists. As is everyone who is unfamiliar with theism, or who is incapable of conceptualizing it. Babies can be expected to subsequently grow up to be either explicit atheists or theists.
Rocks, on the other hand, are incapable of ever having beliefs of any kind, under any circumstances. It therefore is nonsensical to refer to them as atheists.
Atheism is not a belief. It is a lack of belief.
Originally posted by Great King RatI agree generally, that it doesn't really matter what words we use as labels, so long as the definitions are mutually agreed.
I have no problem with calling atheism a "belief". I think it's pointless - just like calling my non-believe in Manbearpig a believe is pointless - but I have no problem with it.
Originally posted by KellyJayWhat do you say about lacking belief in any god?
No, believing that there is only one of something, more than one of
something, or none of something is still believing, and if you believe
that the correct value means all other variables are to be looked at one
way over another because of that correct value, as soon as you choose to
look at all the other variables in the light of your beliefs about that value
than you without a doubt have a belief system.
Kelly