15 Jul '13 06:39>
Do you ever stare at the computer screen with a blank expression for a couple of seconds after you've clicked the Post button thinking "What the fvck did I just write?"
Originally posted by apathistIt isn't the job of atheism to "advance knowledge or understanding about the philosophical subject of theism." That is the job of theism. Atheism has no content to it. It advances nothing. It is the simple absence of theism.rwingett
All babies are born as implicit atheists. As is everyone who is unfamiliar with theism, or who is incapable of conceptualizing it. Babies can be expected to subsequently grow up to be either explicit atheists or theists.
Yes. "Implicit atheism", according to the way its defined in, say, Wiki, does imply that babies (and pe ...[text shortened]... where.
Philosophy Pages defines "atheism" as Belief that god does not exist.
Originally posted by rwingettI don't think I am a strong atheist. The main reason being that the definition of 'god' is too loose for me to make definite statements using it. I do claim that the Abrahamic gods do not exist and that nothing even remotely similar exists. So once specifics are given to the definition of 'God' I will admit to being a strong atheist.
"Strong" atheism (the active knowledge claim that there are NO gods) is an extremely narrow one. You'll find very few atheists who actually take that position.
Originally posted by twhiteheadExactly. Strong atheism is like playing whack-a-mole. You can't account for every definition of 'god.' If you think you've disproved one definition of god, it just pops up somewhere else in a slightly different guise. It's a fool's errand. The only purpose it ultimately serves is to let theists off the hook from having to shoulder the entire burden of proof themselves.
I don't think I am a strong atheist. The main reason being that the definition of 'god' is too loose for me to make definite statements using it. I do claim that the Abrahamic gods do not exist and that nothing even remotely similar exists. So once specifics are given to the definition of 'God' I will admit to being a strong atheist.
But if you talk abou ...[text shortened]... e god, I would have to do some research before deciding what my opinions are on the matter.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThe topic is belief system, not belief about a point of data! The system is
14 Jul '13 02:13
Originally posted by Great King Rat
"It always amazes me that religious people would want to equate their belief with that of the atheist. I mean, "believing" in god is something entirely different than "not believing" in god, isn't it? The way I understand it, theists don't just look at the world and say "oh well, based on emotion
"JS, please help me to see the reference "about lacking belief in any god?"
Originally posted by Great King RatNo, I do not think its the same. Lack of belief about being able to fly could
I have no problem with calling atheism a "belief". I think it's pointless - just like calling my non-believe in Manbearpig a believe is pointless - but I have no problem with it.
Would you agree that my atheism is the same kind of belief as my non-belief in Santa Clause (basically the question that Twitehead has already asked)?
Originally posted by rwingettHow do you know all babies are born implicit atheist, what if they all know
All babies are born as implicit atheists. As is everyone who is unfamiliar with theism, or who is incapable of conceptualizing it. Babies can be expected to subsequently grow up to be either explicit atheists or theists.
Rocks, on the other hand, are incapable of ever having beliefs of any kind, under any circumstances. It therefore is nonsensical to refer to them as atheists.
Atheism is not a belief. It is a lack of belief.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby"JS, please help me to see the reference "about lacking belief in any god?"
14 Jul '13 02:13
Originally posted by Great King Rat
"It always amazes me that religious people would want to equate their belief with that of the atheist. I mean, "believing" in god is something entirely different than "not believing" in god, isn't it? The way I understand it, theists don't just look at the world and say "oh well, based on emotion
"JS, please help me to see the reference "about lacking belief in any god?"
Originally posted by KellyJayI think I see the problem.
No, I do not think its the same. Lack of belief about being able to fly could
cause you to jump off a building and the reality of the fall could be very
bad. Our belief in Santa or lack there of, one way or another will cause
nothing good or bad to occur directly, discounting of course how you behave
due to that belief. Rejecting God would be more like thinking you could fly
when you cannot, the result could be very bad.
Kelly