Originally posted by @eladar
Recognizing that God is Lord and you are not does not equal mutual respect. Paul does not claim that people who ate meat should have respect for those who are wrong.
WRONG? About eating meat? You do realize humankind thousands of years ago ate meat and not much else, right? This meat thing was the direct result of pork having parasites and your precious god keeping the real reason not to eat pork, for instance, that god could have said, Look guys and gals, pork has this problem, there are little tiny animals inside it that will make you sick if you do not boil the hell out of it which kills the little animals inside and then it is safe to eat.'
NO, what comes down is 'Don't eat pork' or don't eat meat mixed with milk' or some such rot.
I am not saying eating meat is better than being a vegan, I am saying the strictures forbidding eating pork was done not by a god but by dudes inserting their words and then convincing the rest of the world those words were passed down to that dude who wrote them out and now we can't eat bacon. THANKS A LOT.
The fact there was no actual teaching by your god but instead, an edict, is CLEAR evidence that a god did not write the anti pork edict.
Your god didn't tell you about a LOT of things did it.
Like For KRIST"S sake don't make pipes out of lead, don't make drinking glasses out of leaded glass, we now know full well the problems THAT leads to. But the Romans certainly did both of those things and it is thought that to be a contributor to the fall of the Roman empire, they just dumbed themselves down.
Funny no god ever mentioned a WORD about how bad lead is for you, or mercury, or any of a number of other elements.
OH, I get it now.
You will bring out the 'fall of man' card. Kicked out of paradise what the hell do you expect?
Funny this god didn't mention lead or parasites in the garden either.