Originally posted by @thinkofoneI seem to give your statements as much credit as you give mine.
You seem to be struggling to follow pretty simple and straightforward lines of inquiry.
You wouldn't be a fundamentalist Christian by any chance?
True, your statements are pretty simple.
Originally posted by @eladarAnd you struggle to follow them - even when they've been dumbed-down for you.
I seem to give your statements as much credit as you give mine.
True, your statements are pretty simple.
There are those who aren't all that bright. Then there's those like you who aren't even bright enough to understand they aren't all that bright. It's a trait that seems to be common to many fundamentalist Christians - they think things are true simply because they believe them.
Originally posted by @eladarThere might be a morally perfect god. But, this god lacks at least one of the following qualities: omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence.
You said you knew that there is no moral god.
Did you mean you know for a fact there is no god? Or that if there is such a god as described in the Bible that this God is immoral?
I am saying there is not a god who has all 4 of these qualities.
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemWhy would it be impossible for such a god to be moral?
There might be a morally perfect god. But, this god lacks at least one of the following qualities: omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence.
I am saying there is not a god who has all 4 of these qualities.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneIf you say so you. It just goes to demonstrate your self importance.
And you struggle to follow them - even when they've been dumbed-down for you.
There are those who aren't all that bright. Then there's those like you who aren't even bright enough to understand they aren't all that bright. It's a trait that seems to be common to many fundamentalist Christians - they think things are true simply because they believe them.
Obviously your point of view is totally screwed up, but you can't see it.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
1 edit
Originally posted by @eladarThis line of argument doesn’t really work in my opinion because you may be demonstrating your self importance and from his point of view your point of view is totally screwed up but you can’t see it.
If you say so you. It just goes to demonstrate your self importance.
Obviously your point of view is totally screwed up, but you can't see it.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI have not attacked what he says and demand he answer to me. This is why he is being hypocritical and I am not.
This line of argument doesn’t really work in my opinion because you may be demonstrating your self importance and from his point of view your point of view is totally screwed up but you can’t see it.
1 edit
Originally posted by @eladarUnsurprisingly the non-sequiturs continue.
I have not attacked what he says and demand he answer to me. This is why he is being hypocritical and I am not.
Originally posted by @eladarYou have the religion of a 5 year old.
It was the statement I mentioned in the earlier post. Disagree with the truth in the Bible and you are a child of Satan.
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemSo if free will is allowed God is immoral.
Because he would know evil was about to happen, have the power to stop it, and want to stop it...and yet, he doesn't.
The only way out of this contradiction is to deny his existence.
But hey, do you get to define what is evil? You keep throwing around these undefined terms as if you have the definition.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneI can only imagine how your hate twists my words.
Based on your responses to me, it would seem that your "worldview" is composed of a mass of non-sequiturs.