Originally posted by @fmfI mean his salvation. He was responding to his response mischaracterizing what I wrote. If you are going to comment on what the Bible says you should actually understand the context of the statement. In this case eating meat used to be considered worshipping false gods.
Why indeed are you trying to explain anything to sonhouse? Haven't you just said "I am out of the loop and leave you to God."?
Originally posted by @eladarWhy are you explaining the Bible to him if you are not interested in what he believes about it?
I mean his salvation. He was responding to his response mischaracterizing what I wrote. If you are going to comment on what the Bible says you should actually understand the context of the statement. In this case eating meat used to be considered worshipping false gods.
1 edit
Originally posted by @eladarWhy do [what you claim to be] "misrepresentations" matter to you when you are also claiming what he believes doesn't matter to you?
Because he was misrepresenting my response to you.
I will correct misrepresentations. Just as I respind to your questions from time to time.
Originally posted by @eladarNonsense. A passage about Christians squabbling about what to eat and what not to eat cannot be also about the billions and billions of non-Christians who constitute what you refer to as "anyone".
Squabbles between anyone. God is the master not me. Your issues are between you and God. I am out of the loop and leave you to God.
Originally posted by @fmfYou miss the greater truth. But hey I am not surprised, why should you be expected to see it?
Nonsense. A passage about Christians squabbling about what to eat and what not to eat cannot be also about the billions and billions of non-Christians who constitute what you refer to as "anyone".
Originally posted by @wolfgang59We are not having a debate. Odd that you think it is.
Don't answer you don't have to!!
What a wonderful debating tactic.
I wonder if it is yours or borrowed from Trump.
Originally posted by @eladarDemonstrating your pride and vanity in your interactions with non-believers seems to supercede any onus you might have felt to spread the word of Christ. And rather laughably, you cite Romans 14 to justify this. I wonder if this is "Jesus flowing out of you" in the way sonship duckpeaks about.
Because he was misrepresenting my response to you.
I will correct misrepresentations, just as I respind to your questions from time to time.
Originally posted by @fmfWhat you state is true without me saying a thing. People do it all the time. Every liberal does this. Seeing as you are spiritually blind you are unable to discern truth from lie. You are one that calls good evil.
Preposterous extrapolations like that mean that anyone can claim that anything anywhere in the Bible means whatever they want it to mean.
Originally posted by @eladarRight now, I know there is no god that is all of these things: omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, and morally perfect.
Would it be possible for you? As of right now?
Any other types of gods, I am agnostic about. This means I do not rule out their existence, but I do not think there is enough evidence to warrant belief.
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemDo you believe you have the authority to define what is moral and what is not moral?
Right now, I know there is no god that is all of these things: omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, and morally perfect.
Any other types of gods, I am agnostic about. This means I do not rule out their existence, but I do not think there is enough evidence to warrant belief.
Originally posted by @eladarThe Bible is widely open to interpretation.
Do you believe you have the authority to define what is moral and what is not moral?
Do you believe you have the authority to define what is moral and what is not moral based on YOUR interpretation of the Bible? Face it, all you have is your interpretation.
Do you believe you have the authority to claim that your interpretation of the Bible is from God?