01 Oct '11 09:31>1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsThat's why I never compare him to cockroaches and rats and other animals simply because I disagree with him.
Sounds like [Dasa] is a human being to me.
Originally posted by DasaHere are some of your "analogies": Thread 142035
I have not done this.
You are simply and dishonestly using my analogies to twist my words.
Originally posted by FMFThat was the thread where dasa, who self proclaimed elsewhere that "he cannot" lie, said that he did not understand what "Marriage, as in Christian marriage?" meant.
Here are some of your "analogies": Thread 142035
I can dig out other "analogies" too, if you want, like the one about my spiritual rejection of what you peddle being no different to it being rejected by "a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy" Thread 137241 and the often repeated comparison to "a pig eating feces" and the one about ...[text shortened]... use people in this way, and now suddenly you are claiming not to have done it?
Originally posted by divegeesterI've just been looking at a thread where he claimed "I personally do not offend anyone". And yet this was AFTER the name change to "Dasa". As you will remember, he made a major apology to the whole forum for offending people... twice. He even changed his name to disassociate himself from what he himself admitted was his own offensive behaviour. So he has said he has offended people. And then he said he hasn't offended people. Both can't be true. And yet he said recently that he does not lie because he "cannot".
That was the thread where dasa, who self proclaimed elsewhere that "he cannot" lie, said that he did not understand what "Marriage, as in Christian marriage?" meant.
Originally posted by FMFI think dasa is under the internet forum illusion whereby a poster believes that what they write must be true otherwise they wouldn't write it; and the more they write a thing, the more true it is. Circular reasoning that reinforces and escalates the apparent behaviour and attitude we see.
I've just been looking at a thread where he claimed "I personally do not offend anyone". And yet this was AFTER the name change to "Dasa". As you will remember, he made a major apology to the whole forum for offending people... [b]twice. He even changed his name to disassociate himself from what he himself admitted was his own offensive behaviour. So ...[text shortened]... Both can't be true. And yet he said recently that he does not lie because he "cannot".[/b]
Originally posted by divegeesterThis is pretty much true for every one of us on the planet -- its one of the big reasons why debates both on the internet and off it often can go on and on and on and on - where everyone is saying the same stuff over and over - and without anyone being able to convince anyone else of anything.
I think dasa is under the internet forum illusion whereby a poster believes that what they write must be true otherwise they wouldn't write it; and the more they write a thing, the more true it is. Circular reasoning that reinforces and escalates the apparent behaviour and attitude we see.
Originally posted by FMFGo away.
Here are some of your "analogies": Thread 142035
I can dig out other "analogies" too, if you want, like the one about my spiritual rejection of what you peddle being no different to it being rejected by "a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy" Thread 137241 and the often repeated comparison to "a pig eating feces" and the one about ...[text shortened]... use people in this way, and now suddenly you are claiming not to have done it?
Originally posted by FMFMy apology was an rhetorical apology meant to sign off from being Vishva and to come back as Dasa.
I've just been looking at a thread where he claimed "I personally do not offend anyone". And yet this was AFTER the name change to "Dasa". As you will remember, he made a major apology to the whole forum for offending people... [b]twice. He even changed his name to disassociate himself from what he himself admitted was his own offensive behaviour. So Both can't be true. And yet he said recently that he does not lie because he "cannot".[/b]