1 edit
You are a deceitful crook.
You edited your post.
In any case I said nothing about 'resurrected'.
Im actually getting very tired of your deceit and nonsense.
You edited THIS post. Didn't you?
I didn't mind.
It was originally two lines.
Then you edited it and added some more expressing your exasperation.
Fair enough. You added something. Meaning didn't change.
I didn't automatically call your editing crooked.
Are you going to explain more about the people in the kingdom in the future being like the blowing wind or not?
(I edited this too. I dropped some words)
@sonship saidI am going to explain nothing. You church fools [you secondson and KJ] continue to demand answers, when the answers are clearly given by Christ.
@Rajk999You are a deceitful crook.
You edited your post.
In any case I said nothing about 'resurrected'.
Im actually getting very tired of your deceit and nonsense.
You edited THIS post. Didn't you?
I didn't mind.
It was originally two lines.
Then you edited it and added some more expressing your exasperation.
Fair enough. You added som ...[text shortened]... ng to explain more about the people in the kingdom in the future being like the blowing wind or not?
1 edit
Why did you insert the word 'resurrected' in what I said.
Like said you are a crooked man and full of deceit and lies.
Probably I made certain that the readers understood that you were teaching that to be "born of the Spirit" is to be resurrected in the second coming of Christ.
DID YOU NOT TEACH THAT ?
There was nothing sneaky going on in me editing that post in any way.
Staling time is UP.
Answer the question if you can.
@rajk999 said"Like said you are..."
Why did you insert the word 'resurrected' in what I said.
Like said you are a crooked man and full of deceit and lies.
You should proof read and edit your own posts.
"...a crooked man and full of deceit and lies."
How does saying that facilitate objective discussion of a topic? It doesn't. It just shows how full of hatred and disdain you are for your fellow man. It's not Christian (Christ like), and it reveals a deep rooted lack of integrity and Godly virtue.
1 edit
I am going to explain nothing. You church fools [you secondson and KJ] continue to demand answers, when the answers are clearly given by Christ.
I think you're over your head in here.
Of course your arrogance doesn't help.
More patience COULD be had with you.
But you invite hardball because you want to play hardball.
1 edit
Rajk999,
So then (you teach), the born of the Spirit (resurrected with new bodies) are like the invisible blowing wind in the next age.
But you don't want to talk about it.
Fine.
Just as long as it has become clear that the born again in the church age are the ones who have been "born of the Spirit".
Stop twisting the Gospel of John.
(edited - I broke one post up into two smaller ones)
1 edit
I am trying to be fair to the pushy and often arrogant Rajk999.
I wrote:
Stop twisting the Gospel of John.
It could be just his wrong interpretation.
A better one is that the be "born of the Spirit" in John 3 does not have to WAIT until the resurrection in the restoration ( the regeneration of the millennial kingdom).
This is the far better understanding in the Gospel itself. And it is a far better understanding in context of the rest of the New Testament.