16 Jan '19 00:07>
@sonship saidGo ahead. Tell me what you believe about somebody I love.
You talk about somebody I love. Why can't I talk about somebody YOU love.
@sonship saidGo ahead. Tell me what you believe about somebody I love.
You talk about somebody I love. Why can't I talk about somebody YOU love.
@sonship saidEssentially, yes. The supernatural/divine aspect. Yes. For all intents and purposes fictional. A historical figure bestowed with a mythology.
The writers of the Gospels weaved a fictional character to make a religion.
@sonship saidWhose perspective on what is true and real do you think I should be propagating on this forum ~ and whose cares and concerns ~ if not mine?
Only FMF cares about what is true.
Only FMF concerns for what is real.
@sonship saidI think you should go into making T-Shirts with that on it.
I know. You use to be a Christian once upon a time. I think you should go into making T-Shirts with that on it. You'd probably make a mint.
Let every person be subject to the authorities over them. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are appointed by God.
Therefore he who resists the authority opposes what God has appointed, and those who oppose will receive to themselves judgment ...
For because of this you pay taxes; for they are God's officers, attending constantly to this very thing.
Render to all their dues: tax to whom tax is due, revenue to whom revenue, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor." (See Romans chapter 13)
"Be subject to every human institution for the Lord's sake, whether to a king as being supreme, or to governors as being sent by him for vengeance on evildoers and praise to those who do good.
... As free, and yet not having freedomn as a covering for evil, but as slaves of God.
Honor all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God, Honor the king." (See 1 Peter 2:13-17)
@sonship saidAs for Paul, you should perhaps consider reading Creating Christ: How Roman Emperors Invented Christianity (Unabridged) by James S. Valliant, C. W. Fahy. Fascinating and very scholarly. I have the audiobook version of it: I'd be happy to send it to you.
And Paul who wrote some 13 books of the 27 NT books wrote Romans 13
So in his basic outlay of the doctrines of the Gospel of God he included words like this:
Let every person be subject to the authorities over them. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are appointed by God.
Handy advice to those wanting to carry on the sedition started by Jesus.
@sonship saidIt's more like my take on the Roman government [and Roman history more generally] and how the Romans executed people and what for.
Jesus was executed for sedition against the Roman Government, reasons FMF's clearer take on history of the Christian church.
@sonship saidPaul, who never met or knew Jesus. Thirteen books? Well, well.
And Paul who wrote some 13 books of the 27 NT books
@sonship saidSedition in the eyes of the Romans, the people who executed him.
This is the leading disciple of the twelve original ones, careful to carry out all the instructions of Jesus as to how to have a sedition against the government.
@sonship saidNo. It's not really about that. Not at all. It's about Paul.
If your book wants to talk about this amalgamation things like Christmas, Easter, Mariology, Babylonian garb and wardrobe, holidays, material rewards for being baptized, I got to know all this years ago.
@sonship saidI suggest you have a listen. It's about the historical Jesus and Paul and about the decline of Judaism. It's a fascinating angle and, as I said, very scholarly with analysis very much rooted in the Biblical texts. James S. Valliant and C. W. Fahy do not question or express any doubt about the divinity of Christ. Not once. That's not what the book is about. Nor is it really about pagans ~ that's a sub-plot and not really part of the book's main thesis. And it certainly is not about the Roman Catholic Church. It deals with the very early history of the Christians and with Paul.
I already looked up the review of your book. And I suspect that it will contain some valid observations about the time of the subsumming of the world's pagan religions into the Christian doctrine by the RCC then married to the empire, to make the empire's "faith" more palatable to the masses.