Originally posted by royalchicken What effect will this have on my syntax? For example, how would the structure of this sentence differ if it had been written by a Christian?
None at all. The only difference would be in the sense that your snytax would be 'Christian' because a 'Christian' wrote the syntax.
Originally posted by royalchicken What effect will this have on my syntax? For example, how would the structure of this sentence differ if it had been written by a Christian?
I believe it would be something like this:
Originally posted by royalchicken what effects will this have on MY sintax? how would the structure of this sentense difference for example,if it has been written by CHRISTIAN?
Originally posted by Starrman I believe it would be something like this:
Originally posted by royalchicken [b]what effects will this have on MY sintax? how would the structure of this sentense difference for example,if it has been written by CHRISTIAN?[/b]
Originally posted by Maustrauser It would also need to be incorrectly spelt and contain numerous typographical errors to demonstrate that Christian script is divinely inspired.
You could go the other way and pontificate--never use one word when ten pompous abstract terms will do. If you choose this style wearing a tall silly hat should help with the flow.
Originally posted by Bosse de Nage You could go the other way and pontificate--never use one word when ten pompous abstract terms will do. If you choose this style wearing a tall silly hat should help with the flow.
Originally posted by dj2becker That my friend is called a "tie-thing". "Syntax" is when a naturalistic government uses the Christians' tax money to teach evolution in schools.
And what's wrong with teaching evolution in schools?
Now, if they started teaching pole-dancing in schools: