- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
10 Nov 05
Originally posted by royalchickenNone at all. The only difference would be in the sense that your snytax would be 'Christian' because a 'Christian' wrote the syntax.
What effect will this have on my syntax? For example, how would the structure of this sentence differ if it had been written by a Christian?
10 Nov 05
Originally posted by royalchickenI believe it would be something like this:
What effect will this have on my syntax? For example, how would the structure of this sentence differ if it had been written by a Christian?
Originally posted by royalchicken
what effects will this have on MY sintax? how would the structure of this sentense difference for example,if it has been written by CHRISTIAN?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
10 Nov 05
Originally posted by Starrmanare You sure ABOUT taht?
I believe it would be something like this:
Originally posted by royalchicken
[b]what effects will this have on MY sintax? how would the structure of this sentense difference for example,if it has been written by CHRISTIAN?[/b]
10 Nov 05
Originally posted by MaustrauserYou could go the other way and pontificate--never use one word when ten pompous abstract terms will do. If you choose this style wearing a tall silly hat should help with the flow.
It would also need to be incorrectly spelt and contain numerous typographical errors to demonstrate that Christian script is divinely inspired.
10 Nov 05
Originally posted by dj2beckerAnd what's wrong with teaching evolution in schools?
That my friend is called a "tie-thing". "Syntax" is when a naturalistic government uses the Christians' tax money to teach evolution in schools.
Now, if they started teaching pole-dancing in schools:
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050327/80/ff3d8.html