@edward-palamar saidShould I go on a big shopping spree & eat everything not good for me from now until then?
To be precise, it ends between December 29th and 30th, 2018 A.D.
-VR
@edward-palamar saidShh!
We are less than 104 days from the completion of the 2,300 day cleansing period of Daniel 8:14.
There is much more info at my website listed in my profile at redhotpawn.
There is even an active topic already here :
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/the-unsealing-of-an-ancient-book.177961
It's a secret
Now see what you've done!
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThere's a possibility, and I know I'm out on a limb here, but someone else other than myself on the Spirituality Forum might actually think for his/her self.
If you want to be precise, explain clearly what happens when the countdown ends.
@edward-palamar saidOkay, I'll go out on a limb and say that nothing, I repeat 'nothing' will happen on the 30th December that will warrant you claiming the Day of the Lord has arrived.
There's a possibility, and I know I'm out on a limb here, but someone else other than myself on the Spirituality Forum might actually think for his/her self.
Nothing.
@secondson saidWhat's the betting Nostradamus will tell him it is actually 30th December '2019' and the countdown starting all over again?
He's busy consulting with Nostradamus.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidEdward Palamar may have nailed his underpants to the mast with a rather unfortunately-specific prediction and that might cause a giggle at his expense.
Okay, I'll go out on a limb and say that nothing, I repeat 'nothing' will happen on the 30th December that will warrant you claiming the Day of the Lord has arrived.
Nothing.
But one should not forget the fact that, in a broader sense, and despite his moronic demeanour on this thread, his far-fetched superstitious beliefs are in fact cut from the same cloth as Pudgenik, SecondSon, Romans1009, whodey, sonship, KellyJay, Tom Wolsey, Eladar, RJHinds, and so on.
Religionist people with outlandish misanthropic beliefs [which cannot be proven to be true] are merely having a giggle at someone who is in fact a like-minded religionist person with outlandish misanthropic beliefs [which cannot be proven to true] because he has made a step-out-of-line prediction that ~ while it will be proven to be untrue ~ simply shines a little-bit-more-daft-than-usual light on the outlandish misanthropic beliefs that are widely held here, that's all.
-Removed-I posted this way back on page 4:
Originally posted by @edward-palamar
It isn't my prediction, but had you read the material at hand you would have known that.
This topic isn't about you and what you think of it.
You can't hasten nor quicken its coming, neither can you slow it down, nor stop it.
Thankfully, your days of insulting people are going to come to a sudden, drastic end.
Of course it is your prediction.
Your "start date" for your countdown is based on a date in your personal life, significant only to you.
And you've changed it after realizing your first guess was wrong.
_______________________
Glad you finally caught up to the rest of the class.
@fmf saidYou've just invented a new swear word. "Religionists".
Edward Palamar may have nailed his underpants to the mast with a rather unfortunately-specific prediction and that might cause a giggle at his expense.
But one should not forget the fact that, in a broader sense, and despite his moronic demeanour on this thread, his far-fetched superstitious beliefs are in fact cut from the same cloth as Pudgenik, SecondSon, Romans1009, whode ...[text shortened]... -daft-than-usual light on the outlandish misanthropic beliefs that are widely held here, that's all.
You can't just say "religious". You have to make it sound vulgar. No doubt you had a sneer on your face as you typed it. 👿
@secondson said"Religionist" isn't vulgar at all. It's a noun. "Religious" is an adjective.
You've just invented a new swear word. "Religionists".
You can't just say "religious". You have to make it sound vulgar. No doubt you had a sneer on your face as you typed it. 👿
@fmf said"But one should not forget the fact that, in a broader sense, and despite his moronic demeanour on this thread, his far-fetched superstitious beliefs are in fact cut from the same cloth as Pudgenik, SecondSon, Romans1009, whodey, sonship, KellyJay, Tom Wolsey, Eladar, RJHinds, and so on."
"Religionist" isn't vulgar at all. It's a noun. "Religious" is an adjective.
Inflammatory, accusatory, character assassinating, ad hominem, siege mentality and insulting. You used "religionists" like a bludgeon.