Creation vs. Evolution

Well what do you think? For you retarted evolutionists, Dust formed the big bang, Well where did the dust come from, Dust forms from dead skin. Got any answers? Post them here. If you can. 😛 :# EVOLUTION IS WRONG!

Originally posted by Sargent Carpface
Well what do you think? For you retarted evolutionists, Dust formed the big bang, Well where did the dust come from, Dust forms from dead skin. Got any answers? Post them here. If you can. 😛 :# EVOLUTION IS WRONG!

if you really want to read about this then theres a few thousand previous threads here you could scan through. But I doubt that you do somehow...

So, let's start with the basics:

1) Evolution does not claim to explain the origins of life let alone the origins of the universe. You seem to have a problem with physisists (and who can blame you...)

2) house dust is formed (mostly) from dead skin cells. Space dust is something different altogether.

3) evolution can't be proven, just as no scientific theory can be proven (only disproven). Then again, I don't think anyone has come up with a solid explanation for gravity yet, but if you'd like to dispute that it is wrong because there's not a watertight explanation then please find a tall building.

Now, I'm not arguing whether evolution or creation is correct, or if some other theory will turn out to be true - but maybe get better arguments that don't make you seem so foolish before you start calling people "retards".

Originally posted by Sargent Carpface
Well what do you think? For you retarted evolutionists, Dust formed the big bang, Well where did the dust come from, Dust forms from dead skin. Got any answers? Post them here. If you can. 😛 :# EVOLUTION IS WRONG!

Take it to spirituality, Spanky.

Originally posted by Sargent Carpface
Well what do you think? For you retarted evolutionists, Dust formed the big bang, Well where did the dust come from, Dust forms from dead skin. Got any answers? Post them here. If you can. 😛 :# EVOLUTION IS WRONG!

Two things,

1) Before attempting to refute an argument it's a good idea to have a clue as to what that argument is. In other words evolution has nothing to do with the big bang and no scientist thinks the big bang formed from dust.

2)There's a forum for these kind of discussion so please take this discussion there.

So, do bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics through divine intervention?

Originally posted by belgianfreak
if you really want to read about this then theres a few thousand previous threads here you could scan through. But I doubt that you do somehow...

So, let's start with the basics:

1) Evolution does not claim to explain the origins of life let alone the origins of the universe. You seem to have a problem with physisists (and who can blame you...)
...[text shortened]... rguments that don't make you seem so foolish before you start calling people "retards".

nicely put

Originally posted by Sargent Carpface
Well what do you think? For you retarted evolutionists, Dust formed the big bang, Well where did the dust come from, Dust forms from dead skin. Got any answers? Post them here. If you can. 😛 :# EVOLUTION IS WRONG!

I believe both exist, life evolves, it's natural. And to me it all sterted with creation.

Originally posted by belgianfreak
if you really want to read about this then theres a few thousand previous threads here you could scan through. But I doubt that you do somehow...

So, let's start with the basics:

1) Evolution does not claim to explain the origins of life let alone the origins of the universe. You seem to have a problem with physisists (and who can blame you...)
...[text shortened]... rguments that don't make you seem so foolish before you start calling people "retards".

Beta Pictoris's dust comes from comets, Comets did not come till after the big bang.

Originally posted by rhb
Take it to spirituality, Spanky.

Its a long story. read genisis in the bible. at least chapter one.

Originally posted by Wheely
Two things,

1) Before attempting to refute an argument it's a good idea to have a clue as to what that argument is. In other words evolution has nothing to do with the big bang and no scientist thinks the big bang formed from dust.

2)There's a forum for these kind of discussion so please take this discussion there.

3 things I already know what that arguement is. hang on. Another thing A birds organs are completely different from those of a dinosaur and how do organs evolve too. Its impossible. Plus were spinning at like 7000000 miles and hour and if there is no god then were in a lot of trouble.

Originally posted by Sargent Carpface
3 things I already know what that arguement is. hang on.

Well why didn't you include those in your post instead of making up stuff?

I have never heard about a hypothesis suggesting that the big bang began as a result of dust. Can you give me a reference?

I might also add that evolution has nothing to do with the origin of the universe.

Originally posted by Retrovirus
So, do bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics through divine intervention?

I'de think so

Originally posted by Sargent Carpface
3 things I already know what that arguement is. hang on. Another thing A birds organs are completely different from those of a dinosaur and how do organs evolve too. Its impossible. Plus were spinning at like 7000000 miles and hour and if there is no god then were in a lot of trouble.

Nicely put Carp

Originally posted by torch71
I believe both exist, life evolves, it's natural. And to me it all sterted with creation.

You are cool and mostly right.