@secondson saidWhat are you on about?
It's the twilight zone spirituality forum. We're all here posting to ghosts thinking there's really someone out there replying to and removing our posts. Maybe even posting under our avatars while we're sleeping and manipulating and controlling the outcome of the debates.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
16 Oct 18
@wolfgang59 saidBirds of a feather...
Seconded
The fact that Raj’s (and Dive’s) staunchest supporters are in the atheist camp is rather intriguing.
16 Oct 18
1 edit
@dj2becker saidNon-religionists are probably going to welcome diversity in terms of ideas and beliefs more than many homogenous regurgitating Christians will.
Birds of a feather...
The fact that Raj’s (and Dive’s) staunchest supporters are in the atheist camp is rather intriguing.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 28783
16 Oct 18
@secondson saidQuick recap:
You're right. You and the mods see them.
1. Romans posted obscene post (s) about FMF's wife.
2. Due to their obscene nature, 'I' alerted them to the mods.
3. Again, because of their obscene nature, the mods duly removed them.
I thought 'you' knew me well enough to accept this matter-of-factly? - You made a valid post early in this thread that there is a line we shouldn't cross. Romans didn't just cross that line, he jumped over it.
Now' I'm sure his wording wasn't so blatant (and probably, to his mind, 'made safe' with an emoticon or two) but that doesn't make his post any less abhorrent. - Becker might like to brush it aside as humor, but I would be genuinely disappointed if you did the same, simply because the target was FMF.
No one should have to deal with such comments.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIf his posts were really that obscene he would have been banned. Since you reported his post you can surely recall his exact words?
Quick recap:
1. Romans posted obscene post (s) about FMF's wife.
2. Due to their obscene nature, 'I' alerted them to the mods.
3. Again, because of their obscene nature, the mods duly removed them.
I thought 'you' knew me well enough to accept this matter-of-factly? - You made a valid post early in this thread that there is a line we shouldn't cross. Romans di ...[text shortened]... u did the same, simply because the target was FMF.
No one should have to deal with such comments.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
16 Oct 18
@moonbus saidHow would you know if the screenshot was photoshopped?
NN said he did; someone else says he didn't. Who'm I spozed to believe when I missed the original post? It is quite easy to take screenshots of posts likely to be deleted and post them to flickr, where they won't be deleted. Then we can all see what NN posted.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
@moonbus saidAttacking parties who do have their own accounts here and can defend themselves is ok? Do you think it's ok to tell someone on here that they suffer from Autism?
@everyone
One of the lines we oughn't cross is: insulting, or making unpleasant insinuations about, other posters' family members. Attacking third parties who do not have their own accounts here and cannot defend themselves is off-limits.