31 Mar '06 17:32>
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemWonder what that word will be.
How boring! 🙄😴😴😴
Originally posted by FreakyKBHlol. How hysteric you can be.
With respect to the dating of the stars, as it has no bearing on the subject, I will avoid that argument, as well.
Originally posted by David CIn addition to Lyons, apparently, we can add this esteemed panel of idiots. Their work is not worth the ink and paper wasted on such 'ludicrous' ideas.
lol. How hysteric you can be.
[b]Do you deny that this pathetic website was one that 'convinced' you of the mythological nature of Jesus Christ?
Although I think there is something to the hypothesis, most of my reading on the subject** were essays from Price, Eisenmann, Barker, Doherty, et. al. Not quite as dramatic, I'm afraid. Hope you're ...[text shortened]... to read on the topic of an Astrological link to JC after I had already concluded JC was M.[/b]
Originally posted by FreakyKBHYour reaction is entirely understandable, Freaky. It must be hard for a Christian to come to terms with the reality that Jesus is Fiction. Doesn't mean you can't be a good person whose life has meaning, though, so buck up.
In addition to Lyons, apparently, we can add this esteemed panel of idiots. Their work is not worth the ink and paper wasted on such 'ludicrous' ideas.
Originally posted by David COh, I'll muddle through somehow, David. Sheesh.
Your reaction is entirely understandable, Freaky. It must be hard for a Christian to come to terms with the reality that Jesus is Fiction. Doesn't mean you can't be a good person whose life has meaning, though, so buck up.
Originally posted by David CMaybe you should just open up a new thread on the entire Jesus Seminar group to discuss their views.
Your reaction is entirely understandable, Freaky. It must be hard for a Christian to come to terms with the reality that Jesus is Fiction. Doesn't mean you can't be a good person whose life has meaning, though, so buck up.