Originally posted by orfeo The chess comment wasn't an excuse,
nor was the headache one (it was an explanation of the discrepancy between the two scores and which was more likely to be accurate),
the online test was all over the world (like most online things, you twerp),
you completely failed in your bullheadedness to understand that I wasn't TRYING to define God (in fact, non ...[text shortened]... different shades of meaning in the word 'control',
So a month of trying, and not one single believer in God has even managed to mention any of his 3 primary properties:
Benevolence.
Omnipotence.
Omniscience.
(BOO)
What a bunch of no-hopers!
Removed
Joined
15 Sep '04
Moves
7051
10 Jun '06 07:53>
Originally posted by howardgee So a month of trying, and not one single believer in God has even managed to mention any of his 3 primary properties:
Benevolence.
Omnipotence.
Omniscience.
(BOO)
What a bunch of no-hopers!
Depends which God we're defining. Certainly those are the properties of a christian God. In which case we already have a definition of God. Well, that was boring.