Originally posted by orfeoGo and lick your wounds in a corner.
The chess comment wasn't an excuse,
nor was the headache one (it was an explanation of the discrepancy between the two scores and which was more likely to be accurate),
the online test was all over the world (like most online things, you twerp),
you completely failed in your bullheadedness to understand that I wasn't TRYING to define God (in fact, non ...[text shortened]... different shades of meaning in the word 'control',
and I am done with this conversation.
Originally posted by howardgeeDepends which God we're defining. Certainly those are the properties of a christian God. In which case we already have a definition of God. Well, that was boring.
So a month of trying, and not one single believer in God has even managed to mention any of his 3 primary properties:
Benevolence.
Omnipotence.
Omniscience.
(BOO)
What a bunch of no-hopers!