Originally posted by HalitoseWho recs this rubbish - oh yes, like-minded simpletons like Orful and Codbreath. Worthless commendations.
[b]The whole point is that the onus is on you believers in God to prove that he exists, not on us non-believers to prove that he doesn't.
Of course. Of course. The problem is that you have dedicated yourself to the converse of the statement, i.e -- there is no God. Just like the theist, you need to shoulder a certain amount of the burden of proof. I ...[text shortened]... ame from the beginning and being funned-out from previous occasions, I passed. Happy hunting.[/b]
What a feeble analogy - if I defined chalk-boards as green, then at least I have given a property.
The best you mob of no-hopers have managed in God's definition is
that God is:
SonOfSaul - "the image of perfection"
Quirine - "God is Love".
KellyJay - just prevarication. Oh and a definition of himself.
Thanks.
JadeMantis - "Transcendent (being beyond comprehension)".
Orfeo - "God is personal "
All of these properties are so vague that they could apply to practically anything and in no way constitute a meaningful definition.
For Christ's sake, this is the being who you devote your lives to!
I could provide a better definition of God, and I don't believe God exists!
Originally posted by howardgeeI guess all that about transcendence and the supernatural went over your myopic view of life. This is a case I'll gladly rest as I don't agree with your definitions of reality.
Who recs this rubbish - oh yes, like-minded simpletons like Orful and Codbreath. Worthless commendations.
What a feeble analogy - if I defined chalk-boards as green, then at least I have given a property.
The best you mob of no-hopers have managed in God's definition is
that God is:
SonOfSaul - "the image of perfection"
Quirine - "God is L ...[text shortened]... ives to!
I could provide a better definition of God, and I don't believe God exists!
Cheers.
Originally posted by howardgeeAs you are demanding to see God while refusing to submit to His prerequisites, it is highly improbable that your demands will be satisfied. Instead, you will be left with the cast-offs from the parade: evidence that something of great importance has passed achingly near you, yet you'll never know what it was that you missed.
Who recs this rubbish - oh yes, like-minded simpletons like Orful and Codbreath. Worthless commendations.
What a feeble analogy - if I defined chalk-boards as green, then at least I have given a property.
The best you mob of no-hopers have managed in God's definition is
that God is:
SonOfSaul - "the image of perfection"
Quirine - "God is L ...[text shortened]... ives to!
I could provide a better definition of God, and I don't believe God exists!
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIf we have to submit to God's prerequisites before we can experience God, how can we know his prerequisites if we have never experienced God?
As you are demanding to see God while refusing to submit to His prerequisites, it is highly improbable that your demands will be satisfied. Instead, you will be left with the cast-offs from the parade: evidence that something of great importance has passed achingly near you, yet you'll never know what it was that you missed.
Typically circular arguing from the God squad.
2 edits
I'm not answering any of your questions until you answer mine, howardgee.
Oh wait, sorry, we have to poke fun at people's names don't we? Um... nope, can't muster the will to even bother. Sorry. I've got better things to do with my time on this site than engage in pathetic name-calling.
Actually, the only reason I keep asking your age is to determine whether you have an excuse for being juvenile - because if you ARE a juvenile, it might just be excusable.
2 edits
Originally posted by orfeoHowardPEE!
I'm not answering any of your questions until you answer mine, howardgee.
Oh wait, sorry, we have to poke fun at people's names don't we? Um... nope, can't muster the will to even bother. Sorry. I've got better things to do with my time on this site than engage in pathetic name-calling.
Actually, the only reason I keep asking your age is to determine wh ...[text shortened]... e an excuse for being juvenile - because if you ARE a juvenile, it might just be excusable.
ROFL?
😞
Originally posted by orfeoYou already tried and failed to answer my questions.
I'm not answering any of your questions until you answer mine, howardgee.
Oh wait, sorry, we have to poke fun at people's names don't we? Um... nope, can't muster the will to even bother. Sorry. I've got better things to do with my time on this site than engage in pathetic name-calling.
Actually, the only reason I keep asking your age is to determine wh ...[text shortened]... e an excuse for being juvenile - because if you ARE a juvenile, it might just be excusable.
FYI I am 37 years old.