Originally posted by FMFYour judgements are nothing but opinion to me. My ONLY judge is God.
Neither your opinion nor mine is of much consequence in the bigger scheme of things, on that we can agree I think. But if either of us ~ or anyone ~ states, claims or suggests things in a public arena like this forum, the inevitable outcome is going to be discussion and evaluation ~ judgements, in other words.
Originally posted by SuzianneMe not having a religion does not rule me out of commenting on the personal opinion and beliefs you happen to have due to your religion. The fact that I don't have a religion does not rule you out of pointing out problems with my morals. I have no desire to see you lose any sleep at night; I am simply responding to the things you are saying on a public message board.
You apparently do not have anything to compare to my beliefs in any truly meaningful way. So your "judgement" is merely opinion. And that's not exactly going to make me lose any sleep at night.
Originally posted by SuzianneYes, but only you and me are involved in this discussion between us about morality and genocide. Evaluating what we say to each other is what a message board is all about. If you endorse a genocide but decline to offer a coherent justification for it, then your moral compass is going to be judged whether or not you like it. If I come here and speak in favour of a given genocide in history, I would expect to be judged and I would welcome the opportunity to argue my corner.
Your judgements are nothing but opinion to me. My ONLY judge is God.
Originally posted by FMFYou are locked into your judgement by your definitions.
Yes, but only you and me are involved in this discussion between us about morality and genocide. Evaluating what we say to each other is what a message board is all about. If you endorse a genocide but decline to offer a coherent justification for it, then your moral compass is going to be judged whether or not you like it. If I come here and speak in favour of ...[text shortened]... in history, I would expect to be judged and I would welcome the opportunity to argue my corner.
I do NOT "endorse" genocide.
Therefore I do not need to "justify" any genocide.
Genocide is an act of man, not God. God cannot commit genocide, no. God carries out His Judgement, which is always righteous. God does not abide sin. Why do you think there are no prophets any more? God cannot abide sin, and can therefore not interact with man or this world any longer. This is another reason He has sent His Son to us. To deal with us and our sin in ways God the Father cannot.
By the way, I'm judged by people in this forum every day, simply because I believe in God. Of course I've come to expect it. That doesn't mean it especially bothers me.
Originally posted by SuzianneWhere is genocide defined as an "act of man"? Genocide is "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group". The question is did your God figure seek the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group? Answer: yes. And adding your circular logic does not add any force to your claim that the desired deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group is somehow not genocide.
Genocide is an act of man, not God. God cannot commit genocide, no. God carries out His Judgement, which is always righteous.
Originally posted by SuzianneI am sure I am judged by people in this forum every day too and often it is probably because I am not a Christian. It does not bother me at all. You say it doesn't bother you either and yet you have mentioned it over and over again.
By the way, I'm judged by people in this forum every day, simply because I believe in God. Of course I've come to expect it. That doesn't mean it especially bothers me.
-Removed-If you believe in God, then you must believe in evil.
God has always tried to protect man from evil. But because of free will, He's not always successful. Sometimes His actions need to get a little bigger. Evil will always lose, and we really shouldn't cry over evil receiving His proper Judgement.
When I said it depends on the time and place, what I mean is that there has to be a need for Him to step in. Early on in our history, there were many opportunities to fight evil and stop its spread. Thus the attempted wiping out of the Canaanites and later the Amaleks. Not so much now, because evil is rife on this planet, it's everywhere.
You've heard it said As in the days of Noah, so shall the coming of the Son of man be. The world is so taken over by evil that it needs another purge, like in the days of Noah, in fact it's fairly overdue. But God established a covenant with Noah, symbolized by the rainbow, that He would never use Water to punish man again. This is why many think next time will be Fire. The time is right for the Apocalypse.
Originally posted by FMFYou're dancing all around the core issue here, and the reason is that you do not believe in God. Because whatever god you believe in, especially one that is capable of sin, is not my God. And this makes you incapable of judging my God.
Where is genocide defined as an "act of man"? Genocide is "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group". The question is did your God figure seek the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group? Answer: yes. And adding your circular logic does not add any force to your claim that the des ...[text shortened]... te and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group is somehow not genocide.
Call it what you want. It doesn't make you right.
Originally posted by FMFYeah, that's hysterical how you say I mention this "over and over again" every time I mention it, which isn't really that often.
I am sure I am judged by people in this forum every day too and often it is probably because I am not a Christian. It does not bother me at all. You say it doesn't bother you either and yet you have mentioned it over and over again.
Spin it how you want. It doesn't make you right.
Originally posted by SuzianneI am not dancing around anything. "Sin" is your notion, not mine. I am not a Christian.
You're dancing all around the core issue here, and the reason is that you do not believe in God. Because whatever god you believe in, especially one that is capable of sin, is not my God. And this makes you incapable of judging my God.
Call it what you want. It doesn't make you right.
Originally posted by SuzianneIf it doesn't bother you perhaps you shouldn't make it seem like it does.
Yeah, that's hysterical how you say I mention this "over and over again" every time I mention it, which isn't really that often.
Did your God figure appear to the Canaanites and warn them of the planned genocide?
Originally posted by FMFYou say you aren't dancing, then you dance.
I am not dancing around anything. "Sin" is your notion, not mine. I am not a Christian.
Many people across the world believe in God without being a Christian.
Just saying you aren't a Christian doesn't say you believe in God.
Now you're the one saying something over and over, without answering the question, btw. We GET that you're not a Christian. This doesn't tell us if or how you believe in God. Again, I submit that if sin is not in your worldview, then you don't believe in my God. And I say again, yes, this MAKES you an atheist.