26 Feb '13 22:12>
Originally posted by OdBodAt my age, I think medical science and technology is great. I just think evil-lution is the rotten apple in the bunch.
Still didn't refute my statement did you? Merely suggested I'd be damned. 😴
Originally posted by RJHindsHow very selective of you. I'm pleased that science and technology may help you as you age, but please remember that the help you receive is born of the same method of scientific thinking that produced the theory of evolution.
At my age, I think medical science and technology is great. I just think evil-lution is the rotten apple in the bunch.
Originally posted by boononNo matter how much hunting, fishing and trapping you do you aint gonna survive in a city.
I know how to hunt, fish and trap without modern tools. I can also build shelter without modern tools. My comfort level would come nowhere near what it is now but I'm pretty confident I could survive without 'science and technology'.
I love science and technology so I look forward to any and all new discoveries in both.
Originally posted by OdBodNot al all. Evil-lution is a belief system, not science. 😏
How very selective of you. I'm pleased that science and technology may help you as you age, but please remember that the help you receive is born of the same method of scientific thinking that produced the theory of evolution.
Originally posted by wolfgang59the bible and its supporters cannot survive without science and technology.
No matter how much hunting, fishing and trapping you do you aint gonna survive in a city.
Our civilisation depends on complex technology take it away and only a very few would survive.
Originally posted by boononBefore the use of weapons and and fire etc we were a food source for stronger tougher carnivores. If you placed a number of people armed only with the bible into the middle of the Arfrican plains and they were unable to use technology,how long before they end up as lunch? Technology was and is essential for survival, the bible is not.
[b]the bible and its supporters cannot survive without science and technology.
I was answering the above statement. I am a supporter of the Bible. I showed how me and my Bible could survive. I answered for myself because that was how it was addressed (to supporters of the Bible). I didn't answer for all of the city dwelling non-believers.
I'm stil ...[text shortened]... the 'survival' of us Bible believers? How did we survive before science and technology?[/b]
Originally posted by boononBefore there was science and technology there was no bible to hinder your survival. To have a bible you need a certain level of technology - stuff to write on and stuff to write with.
When exactly did all this science and technology truly start to ensure the 'survival' of us Bible believers? How did we survive before science and technology?
Originally posted by OdBodOk, I guess. How then did we survive as a species if we didnt have science or technology as you assert, being only a food source for larger carnivores?
Before the use of weapons and and fire etc we were a food source for stronger tougher carnivores. If you placed a number of people armed only with the bible into the middle of the Arfrican plains and they were unable to use technology,how long before they end up as lunch? Technology was and is essential for survival, the bible is not.
Originally posted by KeplerHow does the Bible hinder our survival?
Before there was science and technology there was no bible to hinder your survival. To have a bible you need a certain level of technology - stuff to write on and stuff to write with.