Originally posted by @thinkofone [b]It appears you are twisting his words somewhat to fit your own agenda. (Nothing new there).
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I plainly stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"[/b]
And it is my assertion sir that you are plainly wrong. Why have you mischievously replaced his 'logic' with 'thinking?' Do you consider the two identical?
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke And it is my assertion sir that you are plainly wrong. Why have you mischievously replaced his 'logic' with 'thinking?' Do you consider the two identical?
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
As he often does, GoaD is only interested in "stirring the pot". He's been one of the most deceitful posters on this forum pretty much since he started posting here and often stoops to deceit in his efforts to troll.
Originally posted by @thinkofone As he often does, GoaD is only interested in "stirring the pot". He's been one of the most deceitful posters on this forum pretty much since he started posting here and often stoops to deceit in his efforts to troll.
As he often does, Thinkofone will start talking in the third person when out-argued.
He started of with the following comment:
"As a neutral observer, i think Joseph is winning this argument."
And then went on to show that he was anything but a "neutral observer".
Look at you, trying your utmost to distract away from these questions, relevant to the OP.
And it is my assertion sir that you are plainly wrong. Why have you mischievously replaced his 'logic' with 'thinking?' Do you consider the two identical?
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke Look at you, trying your utmost to distract away from these questions, relevant to the OP.
And it is my assertion sir that you are plainly wrong. Why have you mischievously replaced his 'logic' with 'thinking?' Do you consider the two identical?
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
The following thread is another early example of GoaD's trolling. Note how his posts were in an effort to "stir the pot".
Originally posted by @thinkofone The following thread is another early example of GoaD's trolling. Note how his posts were in an effort to "stir the pot".
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke Why do you always go off topic when faced with questions you can't answer?
Is it an insecurity thing?
GoaD's first post addressed to me was in an effort to troll and his trolling continues. That he's pretending to have always been on-topic is just part and parcel of his efforts to "stir the pot".
As I posted in my first response to GoaD:
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I plainly stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"[/b]
Originally posted by @thinkofone GoaD's first post addressed to me was in an effort to troll and his trolling continues. That he's pretending to have always been on-topic is just part and parcel of his efforts to "stir the pot".
As I posted in my first response to GoaD:
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I p ...[text shortened]... stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"
[/b]Go on, have another go:
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
GoaD's first post addressed to me was in an effort to troll and his trolling continues. That he's pretending to have always been on-topic is just part and parcel of his efforts to "stir the pot".
As I posted in my first response to GoaD:
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I plainly stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"[/b]
Originally posted by @thinkofone GoaD's first post addressed to me was in an effort to troll and his trolling continues. That he's pretending to have always been on-topic is just part and parcel of his efforts to "stir the pot".
As I posted in my first response to GoaD:
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I p ...[text shortened]... stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"
[/b]I asked you a perfectly valid question. I'm sorry you feel unable to answer it.
My first post to you was to highlight you had misrepresented another poster, to fit your own agenda of theists being unable to think for themselves and only regurgitate dogma. If there was indeed trolling in the thread, it was because you introduced it.
Don't try to mix logic and faith
30 Mar '18 20:04
Back to Top