Originally posted by robbie carrobieCircumstantial? You specifically said "these atrocities" in your response to the atrocities described in the OP. Would you have us believe that you were not referring to the atrocities mentioned in the OP when you said "these atrocities"?
its purely circumstantial, i did nor specify the rape of children...
Originally posted by FMFatrocities unspecified and pretexts unspecified, i have already stated what was in my
Circumstantial? You specifically said "these atrocities" in your response to the atrocities described in the OP. Would you have us believe that you were not referring to the atrocities mentioned in the OP when you said "these atrocities"?
mind at the time. where is your evidence of the condemnation Gerald?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI am not "insinuating" anything, robbie. I am saying it flat out and frankly. Your 1st post on page 1 warrants an apology to fellow posters, I reckon. And I reckon you know it too. But instead you have chosen to back yourself into a corner. And to me it seems like an odd way to behave.
ah yes the old Gerald chestnut, lets insinuate some more, cook up some more slime.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou said "these atrocities". If you weren't referring to the atrocities described in the OP that you were replying to, then what atrocities were you referring to?
atrocities unspecified and pretexts unspecified, i have already stated what was in my
mind at the time. were is your evidence of the condemnation Gerald?
Originally posted by FMFyou will get no apology unless you can provide evidence of the condemnation of these
I am not "insinuating" anything, robbie. I am saying it flat out and frankly. Your 1st post on page 1 warrants an apology to fellow posters, I reckon. And I reckon you know it too. But instead you have chosen to back yourself into a corner. And to me it seems like an odd way to behave.
atrocities, you have been asked above to five times to do so and have not done so,
that leads me to believe that the posters were more concerned with dasa breaking the
terms of service than they were with the actual atrocities themselves, how else are we
to account for it, you have not said.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI don't need or want an apology, robbie. I find the things you say, when you are trying to distance yourself from something you have said, far more interesting and revealing than an apology would be.
you will get no apology unless you can provide evidence of the condemnation of these
atrocities, you have been asked above to five times to do so and have not done so,
that leads me to believe that the posters were more concerned with dasa breaking the
terms of service than they were with the actual atrocities themselves, how else are we
to account for it, you have not said.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThere has not been "a plethora [of posts] condemning Dasa transgressing the terms of service" on this thread. There was, however, "a plethora [of posts] condemning Dasa transgressing the terms of service" on the thread where he suggested that all Muslims are rapists and pedophiles, which even you conceded was a transgression of the TOS.
you have provided nothing, not a single iota where a poster has condemned these
atrocities when in fact there was a plethora condemning dasa transgressing the terms
of service, how very very sad.
Originally posted by FMFactually the lack of condemnation with regard to the actual atrocities where dasa was
I don't need or want an apology, robbie. I find the things you say, when you are trying to distance yourself from something you have said, far more interesting and revealing than an apology would be.
fervently chastised speaks volumes and is far more interesting and revealing than your
vile insinuations and attempts not to answer why its the case.
Originally posted by FMFand not a single condemnation of any of the atrocities that he cited, how very very
There has not been "a plethora [of posts] condemning Dasa transgressing the terms of service" on this thread. There was, however, "a plethora [of posts] condemning Dasa transgressing the terms of service" on the thread where he suggested that all Muslims are rapists and pedophiles, which even you conceded was a transgression of the TOS.
very very telling. what do you put it down to Gerald, small mindedness, an
unwillingness to face certain facts, attempts to use a pretext to minimise the Islamic
reaction? Perhaps the mind is used to having serious events and trivia juxtaposed next
to each other. Perhaps he secular liberals are more concerned with forum posting
guidelines, who can say?